The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Control of wound infections using a bilayer chitosan wound dressing with sustainable antibiotic delivery
Abstract
A novel bilayer chitosan membrane was prepared by a combined wet/dry phase inversion method and evaluated as a wound dressing. This new type of bilayer chitosan wound dressing, consisting of a dense upper layer (skin layer) and a sponge‐like lower layer (sublayer), is very suitable for use as a topical delivery of silver sulfadiazine (AgSD) for the control of wound infections. Physical characterization of the bilayer wound dressing showed that it has excellent oxygen permeability, that it controls the water vapor transmission rate, and that it promotes water uptake capability. AgSD dissolved from bilayer chitosan dressings to release silver and sulfadiazine. The release of sulfadiazine from the bilayer chitosan dressing displayed a burst release on the first day and then tapered off to a much slower release. However, the release of silver from the bilayer chitosan dressing displayed a slow release profile with a sustained increase of silver concentration. The cultures of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in agar plates showed effective antimicrobial activity for 1 week. In vivo antibacterial tests confirmed that this wound dressing is effective for long‐term inhibition of the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus at an infected wound site. The results in this study indicate that the AgSD‐incorporated bilayer chitosan wound dressing may be a material with potential antibacterial capability for the treatment of infected wounds. © 2001 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 59: 438–449, 2002
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Design of an artificial skin. Part III. Control of pore structure
Dagalakis, N., Flink, J., Stasikelis, P., Burke, J. F., & Yannas, I. V. (1980) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.820140417 · Cited by 358
Cited by
Kamoun, E. A., Kenawy, E.-R. S., & Chen, X. (2017) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2017.01.005 · Cited by 1,707
Antibiotic-eluting medical devices for various applications
ZILBERMAN, M., & ELSNER, J. (2008) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.05.020 · Cited by 610
Wound dressings from naturally-occurring polymers: A review on homopolysaccharide-based composites
Naseri-Nosar, M., & Ziora, Z. M. (2018) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.02.003 · Cited by 325
Hydrogels for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering
Varghese, S., & Elisseeff, J. H. (2006) · Advances in Polymer Science · doi:10.1007/12_072 · Cited by 173
Electrospun Silk Material Systems for Wound Healing
Wharram, S. E., Zhang, X., Kaplan, D. L., & McCarthy, S. P. (2010) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.200900274 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Mi, F., Wu, Y., Shyu, S., Schoung, J., Huang, Y., Tsai, Y., & Hao, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-11-15
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 438-449
- ISSN
- 0021-9304 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4636
- OpenAlex
- W2100887702
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Control of wound infections using a bilayer chitosan wound dressing with sustainable antibiotic delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.1260
- The paper
- Mi, F., Wu, Y., Shyu, S., Schoung, J., Huang, Y., Tsai, Y., & Hao, J. (2002). Control of wound infections using a bilayer chitosan wound dressing with sustainable antibiotic delivery. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.