The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of molecular weight (Mw) of N‐(2‐hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymers on body distribution and rate of excretion after subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, and intravenous administration to rats
Abstract
A copolymer of N‐(2‐hydroxypropyl) methacrylamide (HPMA) and N‐methacryloyltyrosinamide was prepared and fractionated using Sepharose 4B/6B (1:1) chromatography to produce eight HPMA copolymer fractions of narrow polydispersity and mean molecular weight (Mw) ranging from 12 to 778 kD. These fractions were radioiodinated and injected intravenously, subcutaneously, and intraperitoneally into rats. Their bloodstream‐concentration profiles were monitored and rates of excretion assessed. Following intravenous administration the circulating blood volume available to the copolymers was not molecular‐weight‐dependent. A molecular‐weight threshold limiting glomerular filtration was identified at approximately 45 kD, and preparations greater than this threshold were lost from the bloodstream only slowly by extravasation. Molecular weight did not influence the movement of copolymers from the peritoneal compartment to the bloodstream after intraperitoneal injection. The transfer rates observed could be accounted for by bulk phase lymphatic drainage alone, no transcapillary routes being implicated. Following subcutaneous administration the largest HPMA copolymer fraction (Mw= 778 kD, diameter approximately 30 nm) showed increased retention at the site of injection, approximately 20% of the dose remaining there after 21 days. This could result from physical restriction of movement or from internalization into local phagocytic cells. The smaller copolymer fractions moved readily into the bloodstream whence they were either lost in the urine or they gradually penetrated into other tissues and organs. Long‐term (21 days) body distribution of copolymers following both intraperitoneal and subcutaneous administration showed size‐dependent accumulation in organs of the reticuloendothelial system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Poly(ethylene glycol) in Drug Delivery: Pros and Cons as Well as Potential Alternatives
Knop, K., Hoogenboom, R., Fischer, D., & Schubert, U. S. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200902672 · Cited by 3,533
Engineered Nanoparticles for Drug Delivery in Cancer Therapy
Sun, T., Zhang, Y. S., Pang, B., Hyun, D. C., Yang, M., & Xia, Y. (2014) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201403036 · Cited by 2,164
Diverse Applications of Nanomedicine
Pelaz, B., Alexiou, C., Alvarez-Puebla, R. A., Alves, F., Andrews, A. M., Ashraf, S., Balogh, L. P., Ballerini, L., Bestetti, A., Brendel, C., et al. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b06040 · Cited by 1,350
Block copolymer micelles in nanomedicine applications
Cabral, H., Miyata, K., Osada, K., & Kataoka, K. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00199 · Cited by 1,309
Polymeric micelles—A new generation of colloidal drug carriers
Jones, M.-C., & Leroux, J.-C. (1999) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/s0939-6411(99)00039-9 · Cited by 1,256
Metadata
- Authors
- Seymour, L. W., Duncan, R., Strohalm, J., & Kopeček, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1341-1358
- ISSN
- 0021-9304 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4636
- OpenAlex
- W2041452578
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of molecular weight (Mw) of N‐(2‐hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymers on body distribution and rate of excretion after subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, and intravenous administration to rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.820211106
- The paper
- Seymour, L. W., Duncan, R., Strohalm, J., & Kopeček, J. (1987). Effect of molecular weight (Mw) of N‐(2‐hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymers on body distribution and rate of excretion after subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, and intravenous administration to rats. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820211106
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.