The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hardness and young's modulus determined by nanoindentation technique of filler particles of dental restorative materials compared with human enamel
Abstract
The recently developed nanoindentation technique was used to measure hardness and Young's modulus of small filler particles in resin composites and other dental restoratives. This technique eliminates the need to visualize indentations. Load and displacement are continuously monitored during a loading–unloading sequence, and hardness as well as Young's modulus are then calculated from the load–displacement curves taking into account the geometry of the indenter. Thirteen posterior composites, 3 dental ceramics for CAD/CAM restorations, 1 sintered porcelain, and 1 amalgam were investigated in this study. The results were compared to the hardness and Young's modulus determined by nanoindentation of human enamel. Of the dental materials tested, only five materials contain inorganic filler particles with a nanohardness not statistically different from that of enamel. The predominant fillers in all other materials, except amalgam and the prepolymerized resin fillers in Bell Firm PX, were found to be significantly harder. The dental restorative materials, except the alloy phase in amalgam, were composed of particles with a Young's modulus significantly lower than that of human enamel. The alloy phase in amalgam had a Young's modulus value comparable to that of enamel. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation
Rho, J.-Y., Tsui, T. Y., & Pharr, G. M. (1997) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00073-2 · Cited by 924
Nanoindentation mapping of the mechanical properties of human molar tooth enamel
Cuy, J. L., Mann, A. B., Livi, K. J., Teaford, M. F., & Weihs, T. P. (2002) · Archives of Oral Biology · doi:10.1016/s0003-9969(02)00006-7 · Cited by 721
Mechanical properties of human dental enamel on the nanometre scale
Habelitz, S., Marshall, S. J., Marshall, G. W., & Balooch, M. (2001) · Archives of Oral Biology · doi:10.1016/s0003-9969(00)00089-3 · Cited by 554
Marshall, G. W., Balooch, M., Gallagher, R. R., Gansky, S. A., & Marshall, S. J. (2001) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/1097-4636(200101)54:1<87::aid-jbm10>3.0.co;2-z · Cited by 379
Evolution of the biomechanical material properties of the femur.
Erickson, G. M., Catanese, J., & Keaveny, T. M. (2002) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.10145 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Willems, G., Celis, J. P., Lambrechts, P., Braem, M., & Vanherle, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 747-755
- ISSN
- 0021-9304 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4636
- OpenAlex
- W2150946512
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hardness and young's modulus determined by nanoindentation technique of filler particles of dental restorative materials compared with human enamel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.820270607
- The paper
- Willems, G., Celis, J. P., Lambrechts, P., Braem, M., & Vanherle, G. (1993). Hardness and young's modulus determined by nanoindentation technique of filler particles of dental restorative materials compared with human enamel. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820270607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.