The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Osseous regeneration in the rat calvarium using novel delivery systems for recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 (rhBMP‐)
Abstract
In the current investigation, we report osseous regeneration in critical‐size rat calvarial defects using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2(rhBMP‐) and novel delivery systems based on biomaterials. The novel systems combine rhBMP‐ with dry powder microparticles of poly(D, L‐lactide‐co‐glycolide) (PLGA). The mixture of rhBMP‐ with PLGA microparticles is added to an aqueous solution of biopolymer to yield a semisolid paste. The biopolymers tested include autologous blood clot, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, and sodium alginate cross‐linked with calcium ion. Insoluble collageneous bone matrix was also studied as a control. Test articles were made at 0‐, 10‐, and 30‐µg doses of rhBMP‐ and implanted in 8‐mm‐diameter rat calvarial defects (which will not heal if left untreated). The animals were examined 21 days after implantation by radiography, radiomorphometry, histology, and histomorphometry. All tested materials containing rhBMP‐ restored radiopacity and normal contouring to the calvarial defects. Samples without added rhBMP‐ yielded only soft tissue within the defects. Histology showed restoration of inner and outer bone tables plus marrow constituents. The PLGA microparticles were significantly resorbed at the 21‐day time point. Although small differences between delivery systems were evident at 0‐ and 10‐µg rhBMP‐ doses, all test articles performed essentially equivalently at the 30‐µg dose. Thus, novel delivery systems for rhBMP‐ offer the promise of combining the intrinsic bioactivity of the osteoinductive protein with pharmaceutically acceptable biomaterials. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres
Anderson, J. M., & Shive, M. S. (1997) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(97)00048-3 · Cited by 2,617
Athanasiou, K. A., Niederauer, G. G., & Agrawal, C. M. (1996) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/0142-9612(96)85754-1 · Cited by 1,497
Repair of bone defects using synthetic mimetics of collagenous extracellular matrices
Lutolf, M. P., Weber, F. E., Schmoekel, H. G., Schense, J. C., Kohler, T., Müller, R., & Hubbell, J. A. (2003) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt818 · Cited by 850
Bessa, P. C., Casal, M., & Reis, R. L. (2008) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.74 · Cited by 549
Periodontal tissue engineering by growth factors
Giannobile, W. V. (1996) · Bone · doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(96)00127-5 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Kenley, R., Marden, L., Turek, T., Jin, L., Ron, E., & Hollinger, J. O.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1139-1147
- ISSN
- 0021-9304 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4636
- OpenAlex
- W2107833077
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Osseous regeneration in the rat calvarium using novel delivery systems for recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 (rhBMP‐). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.820281004
- The paper
- Kenley, R., Marden, L., Turek, T., Jin, L., Ron, E., & Hollinger, J. O. (1994). Osseous regeneration in the rat calvarium using novel delivery systems for recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 (rhBMP‐). Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820281004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.