Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

In vitro and in vivo degradation of biomimetic octacalcium phosphate and carbonate apatite coatings on titanium implants

Open access
Barrère, F., van der Valk, C. M., Dalmeijer, R. A. J., van Blitterswijk, C. A., de Groot, K., Layrolle, P.·2003·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

Calcium phosphate (Ca‐P) coatings have been applied onto titanium alloys prosthesis to combine the srength of metals with the bioactivity of Ca‐P. It has been clearly shown in many publications that Ca‐P coating accelerates bone formation around the implant. However, longevity of the Ca‐P coating for an optimal bone apposition onto the prosthesis remains controversial. Biomimetic bone‐like carbonate apatite (BCA) and Octacalcium Phosphate (OCP) coatings were deposited on Ti6Al4V samples to evaluate their in vitro and in vivo dissolution properties. The coated plates were soaked in α‐MEM for 1, 2, and 4 weeks, and they were analyzed by Back Scattering Electron Microscopy (BSEM) and by Fourier Transform Infra Red spectroscopy (FTIR). Identical coated plates were implanted subcutaneously in Wistar rats for similar periods. BSEM, FTIR, and histomorphometry were performed on the explants. In vitro and in vivo, a carbonate apatite (CA) formed onto OCP and BCA coatings via a dissolution‐precipitation process. In vitro, both coatings dissolved overtime, whereas in vivo BCA calcified and OCP partially dissolved after 1 week. Thereafter, OCP remained stable. This different in vivo behavior can be attributed to (1) different organic compounds that might prevent or enhance Ca‐P dissolution, (2) a greater reactivity of OCP due to its large open structure, or (3) different thermodynamic stability between OCP and BCA phases. These structural and compositional differences promote either the progressive loss or calcification of the Ca‐P coating and might lead to different osseointegration of coated implants. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 64A: 378–387, 2003

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.10291

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Barrère, F., van der Valk, C. M., Dalmeijer, R. A. J., van Blitterswijk, C. A., de Groot, K., & Layrolle, P.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12-31
Volume
64A
Issue
2
Pages
378-387
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W2135859840
Cited by
200
References
0
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vitro and in vivo degradation of biomimetic octacalcium phosphate and carbonate apatite coatings on titanium implants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.10291
The paper
Barrère, F., van der Valk, C. M., Dalmeijer, R. A. J., van Blitterswijk, C. A., de Groot, K., & Layrolle, P. (2003). In vitro and in vivo degradation of biomimetic octacalcium phosphate and carbonate apatite coatings on titanium implants. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.10291

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.