Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Design and fabrication of standardized hydroxyapatite scaffolds with a defined macro‐architecture by rapid prototyping for bone‐tissue‐engineering research

Open access
Wilson, C. E., de Bruijn, J. D., van Blitterswijk, C. A., Verbout, A. J., Dhert, W. J. A.·2004·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

This investigation describes the production and characterization of calcium phosphate scaffolds with defined and reproducible porous macro‐architectures and their preliminary in vitro and in vivo bone‐tissue‐engineered response. Fugitive wax molds were designed and produced using a rapid prototyping technique. An aqueous hydroxyapatite slurry was cast in these molds. After sintering at 1250°C and then cleaning, dimensional and material characterizations of the scaffolds were performed. The resulting scaffolds represented the design, and their dimensions were remarkably consistent. A texture inherent to the layer‐by‐layer production of the mold was impressed onto the vertical surfaces of the scaffolds. The surface roughness (Ra) of the textured surfaces was significantly greater than that of the nontextured surfaces. Material analyses revealed a β‐TCP phase in addition to hydroxyapatite for the molded ceramics. Non‐molded control ceramics exhibited only hydroxyapatite. Thirty scaffolds were seeded with culture‐expanded goat bone‐marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and implanted subcutaneously in nude mice for 4 or 6 weeks. Histology revealed mineralized bone formation in all the scaffolds for both implantation periods. After 4 weeks, bone was present primarily as a layer on scaffold surfaces. After 6 weeks, the surface bone formation was accompanied by bone budding from the surface and occasional bridging of pores. This budding and bridging bone formation almost always was associated with textured scaffold surfaces. However, the area percentage of bone in pores was similar for the 4‐ and 6‐week implantation periods. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 68A: 123–132, 2004

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.20015

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Wilson, C. E., de Bruijn, J. D., van Blitterswijk, C. A., Verbout, A. J., & Dhert, W. J. A.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-11-26
Volume
68A
Issue
1
Pages
123-132
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W2109824761
Cited by
184
References
0
FWCI
7.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design and fabrication of standardized hydroxyapatite scaffolds with a defined macro‐architecture by rapid prototyping for bone‐tissue‐engineering research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.20015
The paper
Wilson, C. E., de Bruijn, J. D., van Blitterswijk, C. A., Verbout, A. J., & Dhert, W. J. A. (2004). Design and fabrication of standardized hydroxyapatite scaffolds with a defined macro‐architecture by rapid prototyping for bone‐tissue‐engineering research. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.20015

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.