Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 380

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A digital micro‐mirror device‐based system for the microfabrication of complex, spatially patterned tissue engineering scaffolds

Lu, Yi, Mapili, Gazell, Suhali, Gerry, Chen, Shaochen, Roy, Krishnendu·2006·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A

Abstract

Our ability to create precise, pre‐designed, spatially patterned biochemical and physical microenvironments inside polymer scaffolds could provide a powerful tool in studying progenitor cell behavior and differentiation under biomimetic, three‐dimensional (3D) culture conditions. We have developed a simple and fast, layer‐by‐layer microstereolithography system consisting of an ultra‐violet light source, a digital micro‐mirror masking device, and a conventional computer projector, that allows fabrication of complex internal features along with precise spatial distribution of biological factors inside a single scaffold. Photo‐crosslinkable poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylates were used as the scaffold material, and murine bone marrow‐derived cells were successfully encapsulated or seeded on fibronectin‐functionalized scaffolds. Fluorescently‐labeled polystyrene microparticles were used to show the capability of this system to create scaffolds with complex internal architectures and spatial patterns. We demonstrate that precisely controlled pore size and shapes can be easily fabricated using a simple, computer‐aided process. Our results further indicate that multi‐layered scaffolds with spatially distributed factors in the same layer or across different layers can be efficiently manufactured using this technique. These microfabricated scaffolds are conducive for osteogenic differentiation of marrow‐derived stem cells, as indicated by efficient matrix mineralization. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2006

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.a.30601

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 380

Metadata

Authors
Lu, Y., Mapili, G., Suhali, G., Chen, S., & Roy, K.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-01-27
Volume
77A
Issue
2
Pages
396-405
ISSN
  • 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4965
OpenAlex
W2159230671
Cited by
380
References
2
FWCI
7.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.