The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A digital micro‐mirror device‐based system for the microfabrication of complex, spatially patterned tissue engineering scaffolds
Abstract
Our ability to create precise, pre‐designed, spatially patterned biochemical and physical microenvironments inside polymer scaffolds could provide a powerful tool in studying progenitor cell behavior and differentiation under biomimetic, three‐dimensional (3D) culture conditions. We have developed a simple and fast, layer‐by‐layer microstereolithography system consisting of an ultra‐violet light source, a digital micro‐mirror masking device, and a conventional computer projector, that allows fabrication of complex internal features along with precise spatial distribution of biological factors inside a single scaffold. Photo‐crosslinkable poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylates were used as the scaffold material, and murine bone marrow‐derived cells were successfully encapsulated or seeded on fibronectin‐functionalized scaffolds. Fluorescently‐labeled polystyrene microparticles were used to show the capability of this system to create scaffolds with complex internal architectures and spatial patterns. We demonstrate that precisely controlled pore size and shapes can be easily fabricated using a simple, computer‐aided process. Our results further indicate that multi‐layered scaffolds with spatially distributed factors in the same layer or across different layers can be efficiently manufactured using this technique. These microfabricated scaffolds are conducive for osteogenic differentiation of marrow‐derived stem cells, as indicated by efficient matrix mineralization. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2006
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bryant, S. J., & Anseth, K. S. (2002) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.1217 · Cited by 845
Three-Dimensional Photopatterning of Hydrogels Containing Living Cells
Liu, V. A., & Bhatia, S. N. (2002) · Biomedical Microdevices · doi:10.1023/a:1020932105236 · Cited by 399
Cited by
Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects
Tumbleston, J. R., Shirvanyants, D., Ermoshkin, N., Janusziewicz, R., Johnson, A. R., Kelly, D., Chen, K., Pinschmidt, R., Rolland, J. P., Ermoshkin, A., et al. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa2397 · Cited by 2,278
Evaluation of 3D Printing and Its Potential Impact on Biotechnology and the Chemical Sciences
Gross, B. C., Erkal, J. L., Lockwood, S. Y., Chen, C., & Spence, D. M. (2014) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac403397r · Cited by 1,746
3D printing of functional biomaterials for tissue engineering
Zhu, W., Ma, X., Gou, M., Mei, D., Zhang, K., & Chen, S. (2016) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.014 · Cited by 822
Self-citationAu, A. K., Huynh, W., Horowitz, L. F., & Folch, A. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201504382 · Cited by 788
Gauvin, R., Chen, Y.-C., Lee, J. W., Soman, P., Zorlutuna, P., Nichol, J. W., Bae, H., Chen, S., & Khademhosseini, A. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.048 · Cited by 641
“This PSL apparatus was previously fabricated and used to create 3D PEGbased biological scaffolds with complex internal architectures and spatial patterns in a high throughput fashion [31,40].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lu, Y., Mapili, G., Suhali, G., Chen, S., & Roy, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-01-27
- Volume
- 77A
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 396-405
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W2159230671
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.