The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The pore size of polycaprolactone scaffolds has limited influence on bone regeneration in an in vivo model
Abstract
Bone tissue engineering scaffolds should be designed to optimize mass transport, cell migration, and mechanical integrity to facilitate and enhance new bone growth. Although many scaffold parameters could be modified to fulfill these requirements, pore size is an important scaffold characteristic that can be rigorously controlled with indirect solid freeform fabrication. We explored the effect of pore size on bone regeneration and scaffold mechanical properties using polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds designed with interconnected, cylindrical orthogonal pores. Three scaffold designs with unique microarchitectures were fabricated, having pore sizes of 350, 550, or 800 μm. Bone morphogenetic protein‐7 transduced human gingival fibroblasts were suspended in fibrin gel, seeded into scaffolds, and implanted subcutaneously in immuno‐compromised mice for 4 or 8 weeks. We found that (1) modulus and peak stress of the scaffold/bone constructs depended on pore size and porosity at 4 weeks but not at 8 weeks, (2) bone growth inside pores depended on pore size at 4 weeks but not at 8 weeks, and (3) the length of implantation time had a limited effect on scaffold/bone construct properties. In conclusion, pore sizes between 350 and 800 μm play a limited role in bone regeneration in this tissue engineering model. Therefore, it may be advantageous to explore the effects of other scaffold structural properties, such as pore shape, pore interconnectivity, or scaffold permeability, on bone regeneration when designing PCL scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2010
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effect of scaffold degradation rate on three-dimensional cell growth and angiogenesis
Sung, H.-J., Meredith, C., Johnson, C., & Galis, Z. S. (2004) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.066 · Cited by 804
Cited by
Murphy, C. M., Haugh, M. G., & O'Brien, F. J. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063 · Cited by 2,056
Poly-є-caprolactone based formulations for drug delivery and tissue engineering: A review
Dash, T. K., & Konkimalla, V. B. (2012) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.064 · Cited by 1,016
Vascularized Bone Tissue Engineering: Approaches for Potential Improvement
Nguyen, L. H., Annabi, N., Nikkhah, M., Bae, H., Binan, L., Park, S., Kang, Y., Yang, Y., & Khademhosseini, A. (2012) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0012 · Cited by 313
Characterization of bending behavior of hydroxyapatite/biopolymer porous composite beams
Hazwani, F., & Todo, M. (2021) · Composites Communications · doi:10.1016/j.coco.2021.100747 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Roosa, S. M. M., Kemppainen, J. M., Moffitt, E. N., Krebsbach, P. H., & Hollister, S. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-02-02
- Volume
- 92A
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 359-368
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4965
- OpenAlex
- W2056318812
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The pore size of polycaprolactone scaffolds has limited influence on bone regeneration in an in vivo model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.a.32381
- The paper
- Roosa, S. M. M., Kemppainen, J. M., Moffitt, E. N., Krebsbach, P. H., & Hollister, S. J. (2010). The pore size of polycaprolactone scaffolds has limited influence on bone regeneration in an in vivo model. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32381
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.