Polycaprolactone/starch composite: Fabrication, structure, properties, and applications
Abstract
Interests in the use of biodegradable polymers as biomaterials have grown. Among the different polymeric composites currently available, the blend of starch and polycaprolactone (PCL) has received the most attention since the 1980s. Novamont is the first company that manufactured a PCL/starch (SPCL) composite under the trademark Mater-Bi®. The properties of PCL (a synthetic, hydrophobic, flexible, expensive polymer with a low degradation rate) and starch (a natural, hydrophilic, stiff, abundant polymer with a high degradation rate) blends are interesting because of the composite components have completely different structures and characteristics. PCL can adjust humidity sensitivity of starch as a biomaterial; while starch can enhance the low biodegradation rate of PCL. Thus, by appropriate blending, SPCL can overcome important limitations of both PCL and starch components and promote controllable behavior in terms of mechanical properties and degradation which make it suitable for many biomedical applications. This article reviewed the different fabrication and modification methods of the SPCL composite; different properties such as structural, physical, and chemical as well as degradation behavior; and different applications as biomaterials.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The dominant agent controlling the final mechanical properties of PCL/starch blends is the composite/component ratio, which makes it possible to design a highly stiff (more starch content) or more flexible and thermoplastic (more PCL content) scaffold.
“The dominant agent controlling the final mechanical properties is the composite/component ratio, which makes it possible to design a highly stiff (more starch content) or more flexible and thermoplastic (more PCL content) scaffold.”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [163]
PCL/starch blends present biomaterials with proven biocompatibility and anti-inflammatory characteristics.
“PCL/starch blends present biomaterials with proven biocompatibility and anti-inflammatory characteristics.”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [163]
Controllable mechanical behavior, which can adjust different tissues, made PCL/starch blend appropriate for different biomedical applications.
“In addition, controllable mechanical behavior, which can adjust different tissues, made this type of blend appropriate for different biomedical applications [163].”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [163]
Cites
Lam, C. X. F., Savalani, M. M., Teoh, S.-H., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2008) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-6041/3/3/034108 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Aerobic and anaerobic biodegradability of polymer films and physico-chemical characterization
Massardier-Nageotte, V., Pestre, C., Cruard-Pradet, T., & Bayard, R. (2006) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.02.029 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Polycaprolactone: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
Guarino, V., Gentile, G., Sorrentino, L., & Ambrosio, L. (2017) · Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/0471440264.pst658 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review
Vach Agocsova, S., Culenova, M., Birova, I., Omanikova, L., Moncmanova, B., Danisovic, L., Ziaran, S., Bakos, D., & Alexy, P. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16124267 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ali Akbari Ghavimi, S., Ebrahimzadeh, M. H., Solati-Hashjin, M., & Abu Osman, N. A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Biomedical Engineering; Faculty of Engineering; University of Malaya; 50603 Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
- Orthopedic Research Center; Mashhad University of Medical Science; Mashhad Iran
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-12-03
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2482-2498
- ISSN
- 1549-3296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132139053
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The University of Malaya Research Repository (University of Malaya) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University Malaya (UM.C/HIR/MOHE/ENG/10 D00001016001)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Keywords
- polycaprolactone, starch, biodegradable polymers, polymer composites, Mater-Bi, composite manufacturing, polymer modification, mechanical properties, moisture sensitivity, biomedical applications
- MeSH terms
- Models, Molecular, Polyesters, Starch
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review