The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of chitosan molecular weight and deacetylation degree on hemostasis
Abstract
Comparative studies have been carried out among solid‐state chitosan soliquoid, chitosan acetic acid physiological saline solution, and carboxymethyl chitosan physiological saline solution to discover the hemostatic effect of molecular weight (Mw) and deacetylation degree (DA) of chitosan. It was found that solid‐state chitosan and chitosan acetic acid physiological saline solution performed different hemostatic mechanisms. When blood mixed with chitosan acetic acid physiological saline solution, the erythrocytes aggregated and were deformed. The DA, especially a low DA, in the chitosan acetic acid physiological saline solution, had a significant effect on the unusual aggregation and deformation of erythrocytes, compared with the effect of Mw within a range between 10 5 and 10 6. However, this phenomenon could not be observed in solid‐state chitosan soliquoid. Solid‐state chitosan with a low DA absorbed more platelets and was more hemostatic. Carboxymethyl chitosan physiological saline solution had nothing to do with the aggregation and deformation of erythrocytes but caused local rouleau. The values of thrombin time (TT), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and fibrinogen concentration (FIB) were measured after the blood was mixed with solid‐state chitosan soliquoid, chitosan acetic acid physiological saline solution, and carboxymethyl chitosan physiological saline solution, separately. The results demonstrated that coagulation factors might not be activated by them. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2008
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chitosan as an environment friendly biomaterial – a review on recent modifications and applications
Bakshi, P. S., Selvakumar, D., Kadirvelu, K., & Kumar, N. S. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.113 · Cited by 1,016
Chitosan-based nanomaterials: A state-of-the-art review
Shukla, S. K., Mishra, A. K., Arotiba, O. A., & Mamba, B. B. (2013) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.04.043 · Cited by 929
Development of a chitosan-based wound dressing with improved hemostatic and antimicrobial properties
Ong, S.-Y., Wu, J., Moochhala, S. M., Tan, M.-H., & Lu, J. (2008) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.034 · Cited by 830
Chitosan Modification and Pharmaceutical/Biomedical Applications
Zhang, J., Xia, W., Liu, P., Cheng, Q., Tahi, T., Gu, W., & Li, B. (2010) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md8071962 · Cited by 526
Adeli, H., Khorasani, M. T., & Parvazinia, M. (2019) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.115 · Cited by 512
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, J., Tian, F., Wang, Z., Wang, Q., Zeng, Y., & Chen, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-05-18
- Volume
- 84B
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-137
- ISSN
- 1552-4973 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4981
- OpenAlex
- W2144548728
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of chitosan molecular weight and deacetylation degree on hemostasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.b.30853
- The paper
- Yang, J., Tian, F., Wang, Z., Wang, Q., Zeng, Y., & Chen, S. (2008). Effect of chitosan molecular weight and deacetylation degree on hemostasis. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30853
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.