Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing zinc oxide nanoparticles

Open access
Aydin Sevinç, Berdan, Hanley, Luke·2010·Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials

Abstract

The resin‐based dental composites commonly used in restorations result in more plaque accumulation than other materials. Bacterial biofilm growth contributes to secondary caries and failure of resin‐based dental composites. Methods to inhibit biofilm growth on dental composites have been sought for several decades. It is demonstrated here that zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO‐NPs) blended at 10% (w/w) fraction into dental composites display antimicrobial activity and reduce growth of bacterial biofilms by roughly 80% for a single‐species model dental biofilm. Antibacterial effectiveness of ZnO‐NPs was assessed against Streptococcus sobrinus ATCC 27352 grown both planktonically and as biofilms on composites. Direct contact inhibition was observed by scanning electron microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy while biofilm formation was quantified by viable counts. An 80% reduction in bacterial counts was observed with 10% ZnO‐NP‐containing composites compared with their unmodified counterpart, indicating a statistically significant suppression of biofilm growth. Although, 20% of the bacterial population survived and could form a biofilm layer again, 10% ZnO‐NP‐containing composites maintained at least some inhibitory activity even after the third generation of biofilm growth. Microscopy demonstrated continuous biofilm formation for unmodified composites after 1‐day growth, but only sparsely distributed biofilms formed on 10% ZnO‐NP‐containing composites. The minimum inhibitory concentration of ZnO‐NPs suspended in S. sobrinus planktonic culture was 50 μg mL−1. ZnO‐NP‐containing composites (10%) qualitatively showed less biofilm after 1‐day‐anaerobic growth of a three‐species initial colonizer biofilm after being compared with unmodified composites, but did not significantly reduce growth after 3 days. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbm.b.31620

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Aydin Sevinç, B., & Hanley, L.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03-11
Volume
94B
Issue
1
Pages
22-31
ISSN
  • 1552-4973 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4981
OpenAlex
W1988065839
Cited by
422
References
5
FWCI
22.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing zinc oxide nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.b.31620
The paper
Aydin Sevinç, B., & Hanley, L. (2010). Antibacterial activity of dental composites containing zinc oxide nanoparticles. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31620

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.