The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A protocol for rheological characterization of hydrogels for tissue engineering strategies
Abstract
Hydrogels are studied extensively for many tissue engineering applications, and their mechanical properties influence both cellular and tissue compatibility. However, it is difficult to compare the mechanical properties of hydrogels between studies due to a lack of continuity between rheological protocols. This study outlines a straightforward protocol to accurately determine hydrogel equilibrium modulus and gelation time using a series of rheological tests. These protocols are applied to several hydrogel systems used within tissue engineering applications: agarose, collagen, fibrin, Matrigel™, and methylcellulose. The protocol is outlined in four steps: (1) Time sweep to determine the gelation time of the hydrogel. (2) Strain sweep to determine the linear‐viscoelastic region of the hydrogel with respect to strain. (3) Frequency sweep to determine the linear equilibrium modulus plateau of the hydrogel. (4) Time sweep with values obtained from strain and frequency sweeps to accurately report the equilibrium moduli and gelation time. Finally, the rheological characterization protocol was evaluated using a composite Matrigel™‐methylcellulose hydrogel blend whose mechanical properties were previously unknown. The protocol described herein provides a standardized approach for proper analysis of hydrogel rheological properties. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 102B: 1063–1073, 2014.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate
Discher, D. E., Janmey, P., & Wang, Y.-L. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1116995 · Cited by 6,382
Cited by
Hydrogels as artificial matrices for cell seeding in microfluidic devices
Akther, F., Little, P., Li, Z., Nguyen, N.-T., & Ta, H. T. (2020) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d0ra08566a · Cited by 127
Brain organoid formation on decellularized porcine brain ECM hydrogels
Simsa, R., Rothenbücher, T., Gürbüz, H., Ghosheh, N., Emneus, J., Jenndahl, L., Kaplan, D. L., Bergh, N., Serrano, A. M., & Fogelstrand, P. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245685 · Cited by 114
Rheological considerations of pharmaceutical formulations: focus on viscoelasticity
Budai, L., Budai, M., Fülöpné Pápay, Z. E., Vilimi, Z., & Antal, I. (2023) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels9060469 · Cited by 91
Complex bile duct network formation within liver decellularized extracellular matrix hydrogels
Lewis, P. L., Su, J., Yan, M., Meng, F., Glaser, S. S., Alpini, G. D., Green, R. M., Sosa-Pineda, B., & Shah, R. N. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-30433-6 · Cited by 68
Directing the growth and alignment of biliary epithelium within extracellular matrix hydrogels
Lewis, P. L., Yan, M., Su, J., & Shah, R. N. (2019) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.039 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Zuidema, J. M., Rivet, C. J., Gilbert, R. J., & Morrison, F. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-12-06
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1063-1073
- ISSN
- 1552-4973 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4981
- OpenAlex
- W1505936474
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A protocol for rheological characterization of hydrogels for tissue engineering strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.b.33088
- The paper
- Zuidema, J. M., Rivet, C. J., Gilbert, R. J., & Morrison, F. A. (2014). A protocol for rheological characterization of hydrogels for tissue engineering strategies. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33088
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.