The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of iron oxide nanoparticles on biological responses and MR imaging properties in human mammary healthy and breast cancer epithelial cells
Abstract
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs, diameters >50 nm) have received great attention due to their promising use as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents. In this study, we evaluated the cellular uptake and biological responses in vitro of ultrasmall SPIONs (USPIONs, diameters < 50 nm). We compared the cellular responses between breast epithelia isolated from healthy and breast cancer donors after exposure to carboxy‐terminated USPIONs (10 and 30 nm PEG‐coated, 10 and 30 nm non‐PEG‐coated). The particles were characterized using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS) and gel electrophoresis. Cellular interactions with USPIONs were assessed by confocal microscopy and TEM. Cellular uptake of USPIONs was quantified using ICP‐MS. Cell viability was measured by MTT and neutral red uptake assays. T2* weighted MRI scans were performed using a 7T scanner. Results demonstrated that cell association/internalization of USPIONs was size‐ and surface coating‐dependent (PEG vs. non‐PEG), and higher cellular uptake of 10 and 30 nm non‐coated particles was observed in both cell types compared with PEG‐coated particles. Cell uptake for 10 and 30 nm non‐coated particles was higher in cancer cells from two of three tested donors compared to healthy cells from three donors. There was no significant cytotoxicity observed for all tested particles. Significantly enhanced MRI contrast was observed following exposure to 10 and 30 nm non‐coated particles compared to PEG‐coated particles in both cell types. In comparison, cancer cells showed more enhanced MRI signals when compared to normal cells. The data indicate that cell responses following exposure to USPIONs are dependent on particle properties. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 104B: 1032–1042, 2016.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“which is probably due to the lower internalization of the former, as previously described above and in accordance with results from other authors [57,58].”
From Biomimetic Magnetoliposomes as Oxaliplatin Nanocarriers: In Vitro Study for Potential Application in Colon Cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [57]
Citations
Cites
Wang, Y.-X. J., Hussain, S. M., & Krestin, G. P. (2001) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s003300100908 · Cited by 1,381
Regulation of cellular iron metabolism
Wang, J., & Pantopoulos, K. (2011) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20101825 · Cited by 986
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.addr.2006.09.013 · DOI
- 10.1021/nn800034w · DOI
- 10.1002/nbm.924 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.nano.2011.08.017 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10439-005-9002-7 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00330-004-2405-2 · DOI
- 10.1148/radiol.2432060120 · DOI
- 10.1002/wnan.36 · DOI
- 10.3109/09687688.2010.481640 · DOI
- 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3420 · DOI
- 10.2217/17435889.2.1.23 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ar2000277 · DOI
- Dvorak HF, 1988, Identification and characterization of the blood vessels of solid tumors that are leaky to circulating macromolecules, Am J Pathol, 133, 95
- Sevick EM, 1991, Measurement of capillary filtration coefficient in a solid tumor, Cancer Res, 51, 1352
- Gerlowski LE, 1985, Effect of hyperthermia on microvascular permeability to macromolecules in normal and tumor tissues, Int J Microcirc Clin Exp, 4, 363
- 10.1016/0026-2862(86)90018-X · DOI
- 10.1016/S1040-8428(86)80023-3 · DOI
- 10.1186/1477-3155-10-10 · DOI
- Yuan F, 1994, Microvascular permeability and interstitial penetration of sterically stabilized (stealth) liposomes in a human tumor xenograft, Cancer Res, 54, 3352
- 10.1002/jbm.a.30781 · DOI
- 10.2217/17435889.4.2.145 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.022 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12013-012-9367-9 · DOI
- Thorek DL, 2011, Superparamagnetic iron oxide‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of neuroinflammation in a rat model of radicular pain, Mol Imaging, 10, 206, 10.2310/7290.2010.00042 · DOI
- 10.1109/TNB.2003.820277 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:JMSM.0000021126.32934.20 · DOI
- 10.1166/jnn.2010.2488 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja104683w · DOI
- 10.1517/17425247.2012.682726 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0914140107 · DOI
- 10.1038/nmat2992 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nano.2011.01.002 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0070072 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep02534 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.12.043 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Garcia-Pinel, B., Jabalera, Y., Ortiz, R., Cabeza, L., Jimenez-Lopez, C., Melguizo, C., & Prados, J. (2020) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12060589 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Q., Rajan, S. S., Tyner, K. M., Casey, B. J., Dugard, C. K., Jones, Y., Paredes, A. M., Clingman, C. S., Howard, P. C., & Goering, P. L.
- Affiliations
- Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland 20993
- Office of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland 20993
- Office of Scientific Coordination, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration Jefferson Arkansas 72079
- Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland 20993
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-05-26
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1032-1042
- ISSN
- 1552-4973
- 1552-4981
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Funders
- US Food and Drug Administration Office of Women's Health (750412CDH)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review