The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Substituted hydroxyapatites for bone regeneration: A review of current trends: Substituted HA for Bone Regeneration
Abstract
At present hydroxyapatite (HA) is been extensively investigated for biomedical applications, largely as a result of its similarity in composition to the mineral portion of bone. Although HA undergoes osseointegration and is bioactive and osteoconductive, the inherent brittleness and low fracture toughness limits its use under load bearing conditions, also once implanted in the body, HA takes a long time to resorb. The crystal structure of HA is conducive to a variety of ionic substitutions. To accurately mimic the calcium deficient and carbonate-containing nature of HA in bone, both cationic and anionic substituents have been incorporated to synthetic HA. This article focuses on the incorporation of both the well established (Zn, Si, Sr, F, and carbonate) and latest ions (Ag, citrate, iron, niobate, and tantalates) into the HA structure and aims to highlight the key effects of these substitutions in terms of their chemical, physical, and biological properties. It can be shown that a minor substituent cannot only alter the microstructure, stability and crystallinity of the HA structure in an implant, but also have a significant effect on bone cells colonizing the implant, which in turn can influence the new bone formation and bone remodeling processes. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 105B: 1285-1299, 2017.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications
Gupta, A. K., & Gupta, M. (2005) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.012 · Cited by 6,771
Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials
Rai, M., Yadav, A., & Gade, A. (2009) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.002 · Cited by 6,173
Structure and Chemistry of the Apatites and Other Calcium Orthophosphates
(1994) · Studies in Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-10247-7 · Cited by 2,527
Giannoudis, P. V., Dinopoulos, H., & Tsiridis, E. (2005) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.029 · Cited by 2,078
Crystal Structure of Hydroxyapatite
KAY, M. I., YOUNG, R. A., & POSNER, A. S. (1964) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2041050a0 · Cited by 1,391
Calcium phosphates as substitution of bone tissues
VALLETREGI, M. (2004) · Progress in Solid State Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2004.07.001 · Cited by 1,160
Silicon: A Possible Factor in Bone Calcification
Carlisle, E. M. (1970) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.167.3916.279 · Cited by 925
Reffitt, D. M., Ogston, N., Jugdaohsingh, R., Cheung, H. F. J., Evans, B. A. J., Thompson, R. P. H., Powell, J. J., & Hampson, G. N. (2003) · Bone · doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00950-x · Cited by 876
Donor site pain from the ilium. A complication of lumbar spine fusion
Summers, B., & Eisenstein, S. (1989) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.71b4.2768321 · Cited by 750
Apatites in biological systems
Zapanta LeGeros, R. (1981) · Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization · doi:10.1016/0146-3535(81)90046-0 · Cited by 622
Cited by
Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments
Zhao, R., Yang, R., Cooper, P. R., Khurshid, Z., Shavandi, A., & Ratnayake, J. (2021) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules26103007 · Cited by 641
Self-citationWinkler, T., Sass, F. A., Duda, G. N., & Schmidt-Bleek, K. (2018) · Bone & Joint Research · doi:10.1302/2046-3758.73.bjr-2017-0270.r1 · Cited by 482
Mao, L., Xia, L., Chang, J., Liu, J., Jiang, L., Wu, C., & Fang, B. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.015 · Cited by 334
Tite, T., Popa, A.-C., Balescu, L. M., Bogdan, I. M., Pasuk, I., Ferreira, J. M. F., & Stan, G. E. (2018) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma11112081 · Cited by 282
Hydroxyapatite in Oral Care Products—A Review
Chen, L., Al-Bayatee, S., Khurshid, Z., Shavandi, A., Brunton, P., & Ratnayake, J. (2021) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma14174865 · Cited by 105
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ratnayake, J. T. B., Mucalo, M., & Dias, G. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-03-15
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1285-1299
- ISSN
- 1552-4973 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2297209832
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 76
- FWCI
- 12.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Substituted hydroxyapatites for bone regeneration: A review of current trends: Substituted HA for Bone Regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbm.b.33651
- The paper
- Ratnayake, J. T. B., Mucalo, M., & Dias, G. J. (2017). Substituted hydroxyapatites for bone regeneration: A review of current trends: Substituted HA for Bone Regeneration. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
