ePTFE‐based biomedical devices: An overview of surgical efficiency
Abstract
Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is a ubiquitous material used for implants and medical devices in general because of its high biocompatibility and inertness: blood vessel, heart, table jawbone, nose, eyes, or abdominal wall can benefit from its properties in case of disease or injury. Its expanded version, ePTFE is an improved version of PTFE with better mechanical properties, which extends its medical applications. A material as frequently used as ePTFE with these exceptional properties deserves a review of its main uses, developments, and possibility of improvements. In this systematic review, we examined clinical trials related to ePTFE‐based medical devices from the literature. Then, we excluded all trials using ePTFE as a control to test other devices. ePTFE‐coated stents, hemodialysis and bypass grafts, guided bone and tissue regeneration membranes, hernia and heart repair and other devices are reviewed. The rates of success using these devices and their efficiency compared to other materials used for the same purposes are reported. ePTFE appears to be more or just as efficient compared to them. Some success rates remain low, suggesting the need of improvement ePTFE for medical applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ePTFE is manufactured through a specialized expansion process that results in a microporous structure.
“ePTFE is manufactured through a specialized process that expands the material, resulting in a microporous structure [238].”
From Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [238]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tyrrell, N. D. (2023) · Organic Process Research & Development · doi:10.1021/acs.oprd.3c00199 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Ameduri, B. (2023) · Journal of Fluorine Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2023.110117 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering
Fazel Anvari-Yazdi, A., Badea, I., & Chen, X. (2025) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels11060441 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Roina, Y., Auber, F., Hocquet, D., & Herlem, G.
- Affiliations
- Université de Franche-Comté (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Herlem, Guillaume
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-09-14
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 302-320
- ISSN
- 1552-4973 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-4981
- OpenAlex
- W3200204205
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Conseil régional de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté (OPE‐2019‐0067)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Keywords
- expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, biomedical implants, surgical efficiency, hemodialysis grafts, bypass grafts, hernia repair, cardiac repair, biocompatibility, clinical success rate
- MeSH terms
- Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Renal Dialysis, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Stents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review