Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 289

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy of continued alendronate for fractures in women with and without prevalent vertebral fracture: The FLEX Trial

Schwartz, Ann V, Bauer, Douglas C, Cummings, Steven R, Cauley, Jane A, Ensrud, Kristine E, Palermo, Lisa, Wallace, Robert B, Hochberg, Marc C, Feldstein, Adrianne C, Lombardi, Antonio, Black, Dennis M, for the FLEX Research Group·2010·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

In the Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) Long Term Extension (FLEX) Trial, 10 years of alendronate (ALN) did not significantly reduce the risk of nonvertebral fractures (NVFs) compared with 5 years of ALN. Continuing ALN reduced the risk of clinical but not morphometric vertebral fractures regardless of baseline vertebral fracture status. In previous studies, ALN efficacy for NVF prevention in women without prevalent vertebral fracture was limited to those with femoral neck (FN) T-scores of −2.5 or less. To determine whether the effect of long-term ALN on fracture differs by vertebral fracture status and femoral neck (FN) T-score, we performed a post hoc analysis using FLEX data, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial among 1099 postmenopausal women originally randomized to ALN in the FIT with mean ALN use of 5 years. In the FLEX Trial, women were randomized to placebo (40%) or ALN 5 mg/day (30%) or ALN 10 mg/day (30%) for an additional 5 years. Among women without vertebral fracture at FLEX baseline (n = 720), continuation of ALN reduced NVF in women with FLEX baseline FN T-scores of −2.5 or less [relative risk (RR) = 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26–0.96] but not with T-scores of greater than −2.5 and −2 or less (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.37–1.66) or with T-scores of greater than −2 (RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.75–2.66; p for interaction = .019). Continuing ALN for 10 years instead of stopping after 5 years reduces NVF risk in women without prevalent vertebral fracture whose FN T-scores, achieved after 5 years of ALN, are −2.5 or less but does not reduce risk of NVF in women whose T-scores are greater than −2. © 2010 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbmr.11

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 289

Metadata

Authors
Schwartz, A. V., Bauer, D. C., Cummings, S. R., Cauley, J. A., Ensrud, K. E., Palermo, L., Wallace, R. B., Hochberg, M. C., Feldstein, A. C., Lombardi, A., Black, D. M., & for the FLEX Research Group
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2010-04-30
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
976-982
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2099244701
Cited by
289
References
4
FWCI
25.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.