Cited by 123Bone health and osteoporosis researchPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Eom, Chun-Sick, Lee, Hyun-Ki, Ye, Sungmin, Park, Sang Min, Cho, Kyung-Hwan·2012·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

Previous studies have reported inconsistent findings regarding the association between the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and the risk of fracture. We identified relevant studies by searching three electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library) from their inception to October 20, 2010. Two evaluators independently extracted data. Because of heterogeneity, we used random-effects meta-analysis to obtain pooled estimates of effect. We identified 12 studies: seven case-control studies and five cohort studies. A meta-analysis of these 12 observational studies showed that the overall risk of fracture was higher among people using SSRIs (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51-1.90, I(2 ) = 89.9%). Subgroup analysis by adjusted number of key risk factors for osteoporotic fracture showed a greater increased fracture risk in those adjusted for fewer than four variables (adjusted OR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.57-2.13, I(2) = 88.0%) than those adjusted for four or more variables (adjusted OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.27-1.49, I(2) = 46.1%). The pooled ORs anatomical site of fracture in the hip/femur, spine, and wrist/forearm were 2.06 (95% CI 1.84-2.30, I(2 ) = 62.3%), 1.34 (95% CI 1.13-1.59, I(2 ) = 48.5%), and 1.51 (95% CI 1.26-1.82, I(2 ) = 76.6%), respectively. Subgroup analysis by exposure duration revealed that the strength of the association decreased with a longer window of SSRI administration before the index date. The risk of f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbmr.1554

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eom, C.-S., Lee, H.-K., Ye, S., Park, S. M., & Cho, K.-H.
Affiliations
  • Hallym University (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Park, Sang Min
  • Cho, Kyung-Hwan
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
2012-01-18
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
1186-1195
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2062826597
Cited by
123
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fracture risk, osteoporotic fractures, hip fracture, spinal fractures, wrist fractures, exposure duration, osteoporosis risk factors, antidepressant side effects, drug safety, fracture site distribution
MeSH terms
Depression, Humans, MEDLINE, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Risk Assessment, Databases as Topic, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review