The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bone mineral density loss in relation to the final menstrual period in a multiethnic cohort: Results from the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN)
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this study was to describe the time of onset and offset of bone mineral density (BMD) loss relative to the date of the final menstrual period (FMP); the rate and amount of BMD decline during the 5 years before and the 5 years after the FMP; and the independent associations between age at FMP, body mass index (BMI), and race/ethnicity with rates of BMD loss during this time interval. The sample included 242 African American, 384 white, 117 Chinese, and 119 Japanese women, pre- or early perimenopausal at baseline, who had experienced their FMP and for whom an FMP date could be determined. Loess-smoothed curves showed that BMD loss began 1 year before the FMP and decelerated (but did not cease) 2 years after the FMP, at both the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) sites. Piecewise, linear, mixed-effects regression models demonstrated that during the 10-year observation period, at each bone site, the rates and cumulative amounts of bone loss were greatest from 1 year before through 2 years after the FMP, termed the transmenopause. Postmenopausal loss rates, those occurring between 2 and 5 years after the FMP, were less than those observed during transmenopause. Cumulative, 10-year LS BMD loss was 10.6%; 7.38% was lost during the transmenopause. Cumulative FN loss was 9.1%; 5.8% was lost during the transmenopause. Greater BMI and African American heritage were related to slower loss rates, whereas the opposite was true of Japanese and Chinese ancestry. © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Riggs, B. L., Melton, L. J., Robb, R. A., Camp, J. J., Atkinson, E. J., Peterson, J. M., Rouleau, P. A., McCollough, C. H., Bouxsein, M. L., & Khosla, S. (2004) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.040916 · Cited by 925
Cited by
Prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis
Tella, S. H., & Gallagher, J. C. (2014) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.09.008 · Cited by 786
Changes in body composition and weight during the menopause transition
Greendale, G. A., Sternfeld, B., Huang, M., Han, W., Karvonen-Gutierrez, C., Ruppert, K., Cauley, J. A., Finkelstein, J. S., Jiang, S.-F., & Karlamangla, A. S. (2019) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.124865 · Cited by 491
Self-citationGolden, S. H., Brown, A., Cauley, J. A., Chin, M. H., Gary-Webb, T. L., Kim, C., Sosa, J. A., Sumner, A. E., & Anton, B. (2012) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2012-2043 · Cited by 405
Menopausal hormone therapy for the management of osteoporosis
Gosset, A., Pouillès, J.-M., & Trémollieres, F. (2021) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.beem.2021.101551 · Cited by 193
Longitudinal assessment of physical activity and cognitive outcomes among women at midlife
Greendale, G. A., Han, W., Huang, M., Upchurch, D. M., Karvonen-Gutierrez, C., Avis, N. E., & Karlamangla, A. S. (2021) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.3227 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Greendale, G. A., Sowers, M., Han, W., Huang, M.-H., Finkelstein, J. S., Crandall, C. J., Lee, J. S., & Karlamangla, A. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-10-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-118
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W1994846643
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.