The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FRAX underestimates fracture risk in patients with diabetes
Abstract
The study objective was to determine whether diabetes is a risk factor for incident hip or major osteoporotic fractures independent of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). Men and women with diabetes (n = 3518) and nondiabetics (n = 36,085) aged ≥50 years at the time of bone mineral density (BMD) testing (1990 to 2007) were identified in a large clinical database from Manitoba, Canada. FRAX probabilities were calculated, and fracture outcomes to 2008 were established via linkage with a population-based data repository. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine if diabetes was associated with incident hip fractures or major osteoporotic fractures after controlling for FRAX risk factors. Mean 10-year probabilities of fracture were similar between groups for major fractures (diabetic 11.1 ± 7.2 versus nondiabetic 10.9 ± 7.3, p = 0.116) and hip fractures (diabetic 2.9 ± 4.4 versus nondiabetic 2.8 ± 4.4, p = 0.400). Diabetes was a significant predictor of subsequent major osteoporotic fracture (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42–1.83) after controlling for age, sex, medication use, and FRAX risk factors including BMD. Similar results were seen after adjusting for FRAX probability directly (HR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.40–1.79). Diabetes was also associated with significantly higher risk for hip fractures (p < 0.001). Higher mortality from diabetes attenuated but did not eliminate the excess fracture risk. FRAX underestimated observed major osteoporotic and hip fracture risk in diabetics (adjusted for competing mortality) but demonstrated good concordance with observed fractures for nondiabetics. We conclude that diabetes confers an increased risk of fracture that is independent of FRAX derived with BMD. This suggests that diabetes might be considered for inclusion in future iterations of FRAX. © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Updated Data on Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Levels of US Adults
Looker, A. C., Wahner, H. W., Dunn, W. L., Calvo, M. S., Harris, T. B., Heyse, S. P., Johnston Jr, C. C., & Lindsay, R. (1998) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s001980050093 · Cited by 1,121 · cited 1×
“We used the provincial pharmacy database to identify use of osteoporosisrelated medication (90 days or more of pharmacy dispensations for hormone therapy, bisphosphonate, selective estrogenreceptor modulator, parathyroid hormone or recombinant human parathyroid hormone analog [1-34], calcitonin during the year before…”
Method
Cited by
European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
on behalf of the Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis (ESCEO) and the Committees of Scientific Advisors and National Societies of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), Kanis, J. A., Cooper, C., Rizzoli, R., & Reginster, J.-Y. (2019) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-018-4704-5 · Cited by 1,900
Self-citationCamacho, P. M., Petak, S. M., Binkley, N., Diab, D. L., Eldeiry, L. S., Farooki, A., Harris, S. T., Hurley, D. L., Kelly, J., Lewiecki, E. M., et al. (2020) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/gl-2020-0524suppl · Cited by 1,182
Camacho, P. M., Petak, S. M., Binkley, N., Clarke, B. L., Harris, S. T., Hurley, D. L., Kleerekoper, M., Lewiecki, E. M., Miller, P. D., Narula, H. S., et al. (2016) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep161435.esgl · Cited by 1,140
UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis
Gregson, C. L., Armstrong, D. J., Bowden, J., Cooper, C., Edwards, J., Gittoes, N. J. L., Harvey, N., Kanis, J., Leyland, S., Low, R., et al. (2022) · Archives of Osteoporosis · doi:10.1007/s11657-022-01061-5 · Cited by 593
Self-citationIn Vivo Assessment of Bone Quality in Postmenopausal Women With Type 2 Diabetes
Farr, J. N., Drake, M. T., Amin, S., Melton, L. J., McCready, L. K., & Khosla, S. (2014) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.2106 · Cited by 499
A meta-analysis of the association of fracture risk and body mass index in women
Johansson, H., Kanis, J. A., Odén, A., McCloskey, E., Chapurlat, R. D., Christiansen, C., Cummings, S. R., Diez-Perez, A., Eisman, J. A., Fujiwara, S., et al. (2014) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.2017 · Cited by 480
Self-citationNilsson, A. G., Sundh, D., Johansson, L., Nilsson, M., Mellström, D., Rudäng, R., Zoulakis, M., Wallander, M., Darelid, A., & Lorentzon, M. (2017) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.3057 · Cited by 217
Bone disease in diabetes: another manifestation of microvascular disease?
Shanbhogue, V. V., Hansen, S., Frost, M., Brixen, K., & Hermann, A. P. (2017) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(17)30134-1 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Giangregorio, L. M., Leslie, W. D., Lix, L. M., Johansson, H., Oden, A., McCloskey, E., & Kanis, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-11-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 301-308
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W1994744900
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.