The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bone density of the radius, spine, and proximal femur in osteoporosis
Abstract
Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in 140 normal young women (aged 20 to 39 years) and in 423 consecutive women over age 40 referred for evaluation of osteoporosis. Lumbar spine and proximal femur BMD was measured using dual-photon absorptiometry (153Gd), whereas the radius shaft measurement used single-photon absorptiometry (125I). There were 324 older women with no fractures, of which 278 aged 60 to 80 years served as age-matched controls. There were 99 women with fractures including 32 with vertebral and 22 with hip fractures. Subsequently, another 25 women with hip fractures had BMD measured in another laboratory; their mean BMD was within 2% of that of the original series. The mean age in both the nonfracture and fracture groups was 70 ± 5 years. The BMD in the age-matched controls was 20% to 25% below that of normal young women for the radius, spine, and femur, but the Ward's triangle region of the femur showed even greater loss (35%). The mean BMD at all sites in the crush fracture cases was about 10% to 15% below that of age-matched controls. Spinal abnormality was best discriminated by spine and femoral measurements (Z score about 0.9). In women with hip fractures, the BMD was 10% below that of age-matched controls for the radius and the spine, and the BMD for the femoral sites was about 25% to 30% below that of age-matched control (Z score about 1.6). Femoral densities gave the best discrimination of hip fracture cases and even reflected spinal osteopenia. In contrast, neither the spine nor the radius reflected the full extent of femoral osteopenia in hip fracture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures
Cummings, S. R., Browner, W., Cummings, S. R., Black, D. M., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W., Genant, H. K., Cauley, J., Ensrud, K., Scott, J., et al. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92555-8 · Cited by 2,446
Bone Mineral Density in Women with Depression
Michelson, D., Stratakis, C., Hill, L., Reynolds, J., Galliven, E., Chrousos, G., & Gold, P. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199610173351602 · Cited by 471
Age-related decrements in bone mineral density in women over 65
Steiger, P., Cummings, S. R., Black, D. M., Spencer, N. E., & Genant, H. K. (1992) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650070606 · Cited by 344
A critical review of bone mass and the risk of fractures in osteoporosis
Ross, P. D., Davis, J. W., Vogel, J. M., & Wasnich, R. D. (1990) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf02555036 · Cited by 275
Biomechanics of Fracture Risk Prediction of the Hip and Spine by Quantitative Computed Tomography
Hayes, W. C., Piazza, S. J., & Zysset, P. K. (1991) · Radiologic Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0033-8389(22)02675-6 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazess, R. B., Barden, H., Ettinger, M., & Schultz, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988-02-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-18
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2045054294
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bone density of the radius, spine, and proximal femur in osteoporosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbmr.5650030104
- The paper
- Mazess, R. B., Barden, H., Ettinger, M., & Schultz, E. (1988). Bone density of the radius, spine, and proximal femur in osteoporosis. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650030104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.