Cited by 2,446Bone health and osteoporosis researchHip and Femur FracturesMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures

Cummings, S.R., Browner, W., Cummings, S.R., Black, D.M., Nevitt, M.C., Browner, W., Genant, H.K., Cauley, J. +3 more·1993·The Lancet

Abstract

Women with low bone density in the radius or calcaneus are at increased risk of hip fracture. To see whether bone density of the hip measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry is a better predictor of hip fracture than measurements of other bones, we assessed bone density at several sites in 8134 women aged 65 years or more. 65 women had hip fractures during a mean follow-up of 1.8 years. Each SD decrease in femoral neck bone density increased the age-adjusted risk of hip fracture 2.6 times (95% CL 1.9, 3.6). Women with bone density in the lowest quartile had an 8.5-fold greater risk of hip fracture than those in the highest quartile. Bone density of the femoral neck was a better predictor than measurements of the spine (p < 0.0001), radius (p < 0.002), and moderately better than the calcaneus (p = 0.10). Low hip bone density is a stronger predictor of hip fracture than bone density at other sites. Efforts to prevent hip fractures should focus on women with low hip bone density.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92555-8

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cummings, S. R., Browner, W., Cummings, S. R., Black, D. M., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W., Genant, H. K., Cauley, J., Ensrud, K., Scott, J., & Vogt, T. M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research (US)
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-01
Volume
341
Issue
8837
Pages
72-75
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W1982942836
Cited by
2,446
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 68
FWCI
112.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (1-RO1-AG05407, R01AG005394, 5 RO1-AG05394, R01AG005407)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (1-RO1-AR35582, R01AR035582)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
hip fracture, bone mineral density, femoral neck, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, osteoporosis, fracture risk prediction, women, radius, calcaneus, spine, osteoporotic fracture prevention
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Calcaneus, Female, Femur, Hip Fractures, Humans, Lumbar Vertebrae, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Radius, ROC Curve, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review