The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Skeletal disease in primary hyperparathyroidism
Abstract
Most patients with primary hyperparathyroidism in the 1980s do not have evidence of bone disease when they are evaluated by conventional radiography. We sought to determine whether skeletal involvement can be appreciated when more sensitive techniques, such as bone densitometry and bone biopsy, are utilized. We investigated 52 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. They had mild hypercalcemia, 2.8 ± 0.03 mmol/liter (11.1 ± 0.1 mg/dl), low normal phosphorus, 0.9 ± 0.03 mmol/liter (2.8 ± 0.1 mg/dl), and no symptoms or specific radiological signs of skeletal involvement. The greatest reduction in bone mineral density was found at the site of predominantly cortical bone, the radius (0.54 ± 0.1 g/cm; 79 ± 2% of expected), whereas the site of predominantly cancellous bone, the lumbar spine (1.07 ± 0.03 g/cm2), was normal (95 ± 3% of expected). The site of mixed composition, the femoral neck (0.78 ± 0.14 g/cm2), gave an intermediate value (89 ± 2% of expected). Preferential involvement of cortical bone with apparent preservation of cancellous bone in primary hyperparathyroidism was confirmed by percutaneous bone biopsy. Over 80% of patients had a mean cortical width below the expected mean, whereas cancellous bone volume in over 80% of patients was above the expected mean. The results indicate that the majority of patients with asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism have evidence by bone densitometry and bone biopsy for cortical bone disease. The results also indicate that the mild hyperparathyroid state may be protective of cancellous bone. The therapeutic implications of these observations await further longitudinal experience with this study population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Osteoclasts: more than ‘bone eaters’
Charles, J. F., & Aliprantis, A. O. (2014) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2014.06.001 · Cited by 391
Bone and gastric bypass surgery: effects of dietary calcium and vitamin D
Goode, L. R., Brolin, R. E., Chowdhury, H. A., & Shapses, S. A. (2004) · Obesity Research · doi:10.1038/oby.2004.7 · Cited by 233
Modulation of bone remodeling by the gut microbiota: A new therapy for osteoporosis
Lyu, Z., Hu, Y., Guo, Y., & Liu, D. (2023) · Bone Research · doi:10.1038/s41413-023-00264-x · Cited by 207
Bone loss after bariatric surgery: causes, consequences, and management
Stein, E. M., & Silverberg, S. J. (2014) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(13)70183-9 · Cited by 199
Self-citationCarrasco, F., Ruz, M., Rojas, P., Csendes, A., Rebolledo, A., Codoceo, J., Inostroza, J., Basfi-fer, K., Papapietro, K., Rojas, J., et al. (2009) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-008-9638-0 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Silverberg, S. J., Shane, E., de la Cruz, L., Dempster, D. W., Feldman, F., Seldin, D., Jacobs, T. P., Siris, E. S., Cafferty, M., Parisien, M. V., Lindsay, R., Clemens, T. L., & Dr. Bilezikian, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1989-06-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 283-291
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2062585588
- Cited by
- 625
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Skeletal disease in primary hyperparathyroidism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbmr.5650040302
- The paper
- Silverberg, S. J., Shane, E., de la Cruz, L., Dempster, D. W., Feldman, F., Seldin, D., Jacobs, T. P., Siris, E. S., Cafferty, M., Parisien, M. V., Lindsay, R., Clemens, T. L., & Dr. Bilezikian, J. P. (1989). Skeletal disease in primary hyperparathyroidism. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650040302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.