The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bone mineral density in elderly men and women: Results from the framingham osteoporosis study
Abstract
Our study investigated bone mineral density of the proximal femur and ultradistal and proximal radius in a population of elderly men and women. The Framingham study started in 1948, following a population-based sample for evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors and events. During the 20th biennial Framingham examination (1988–89) we conducted the Framingham osteoporosis study, measuring bone mineral density in the proximal femur and distal and proximal radius for 1154 study participants. Ages ranged from 68 to 98 years, with a mean age of 76 years. Bone mineral density was measured using Lunar SP2 and DP3 densitometers. This cross-sectional study evaluates mean bone mineral density measurements at each site by 5 year age intervals for men and women, testing for trends in bone density with age. Analyses were repeated adjusting for weight and height. Among the 446 and 708 women, bone mineral density of the femur and bone mineral content of the proximal radius were inversely and significantly related to age in both sexes and were considerably higher in men than women at all sites. The linear decline with age group in our cross-sectional study remained after multivariate adjustment for height and weight. The ultradistal radius showed no significant correlation with age for either sex. There were significant correlations between the bone measurements made at different sites for both men and women (range in r = 0.27–0.89). Cross-sectional curves of bone mineral density with age showed no significant differences in slope between males and females. In this cross-sectional study, we found that increased age was significantly associated with decreased bone mass in a linear and equivalent fashion for both men and women through the elderly years in the proximal femur and proximal radius.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effects of weight and body mass index on bone mineral density in men and women: The framingham study
Felson, D. T., Zhang, Y., Hannan, M. T., & Anderson, J. J. (1993) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650080507 · Cited by 987
Self-citationTucker, K. L., Hannan, M. T., Chen, H., Cupples, L. A., Wilson, P. W., & Kiel, D. P. (1999) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/69.4.727 · Cited by 705
Self-citationHsu, Y.-H., Venners, S. A., Terwedow, H. A., Feng, Y., Niu, T., Li, Z., Laird, N., Brain, J. D., Cummings, S. R., Bouxsein, M. L., et al. (2006) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/83.1.146 · Cited by 537
Effect of Dietary Protein on Bone Loss in Elderly Men and Women: The Framingham Osteoporosis Study
Hannan, M. T., Tucker, K. L., Dawson-Hughes, B., Cupples, L. A., Felson, D. T., & Kiel, D. P. (2000) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.12.2504 · Cited by 536
Self-citationJones, G., Nguyen, T., Sambrook, P., Kelly, P. J., & Eisman, J. A. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6956.691 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Hannan, M. T., Felson, D. T., & Anderson, J. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-05-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 547-553
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2028118564
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bone mineral density in elderly men and women: Results from the framingham osteoporosis study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbmr.5650070511
- The paper
- Hannan, M. T., Felson, D. T., & Anderson, J. J. (1992). Bone mineral density in elderly men and women: Results from the framingham osteoporosis study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650070511
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.