Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 987

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of weight and body mass index on bone mineral density in men and women: The framingham study

Felson, David T., Zhang, Yuqing, Hannan, Marian T., Anderson, Jennifer J.·1993·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

We evaluated the association of weight and bone mass in elderly male and female subjects of the Framingham osteoporosis study, a subset of the Framingham study cohort. By examining the differences in the correlations of weight with bone mass among men and women in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing sites and weight change since early adulthood, we attempted to understand different ways in which weight or body mass index affects bone mass. During biennial examination 20 of the Framingham cohort (1988–1989), 693 women and 439 men (mean age 76 years) had proximal femur bone mineral density assessed by dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) and radius bone mass assessed by single-photon absorptiometry. The majority of these subjects also had spine measurements by DPA. Subjects had been weighed repeatedly over 40 years. After adjusting for other factors affecting bone density, we found that both recent weight and body mass index explained a substantial proportion of the variance in bone mineral density for all sites in women (8.9–19.8% of total variance, all p < 0.01) and for only weight-bearing sites (femur and spine) in men (2.8–6.9% of total variance, all p < 0.01). For bone mineral density at the proximal radius, weight and body mass index accounted for < 1% of variance in men (p NS). Weight change since biennial examination 1 (1948–1951) was the strongest explanatory factor for bone mineral density among women at all sites, but weight change did not affect radius bone mineral density in men. The effect of weight and of weight change on bone mineral density was in general much less in men than in women. Our results suggest that the strong effect of weight on bone mineral density is due to load on weight-bearing bones in both sexes. The sex difference is unexplained but may be due to adipose tissue production of estrogen in women after menopause.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbmr.5650080507

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 987

Metadata

Authors
Felson, D. T., Zhang, Y., Hannan, M. T., & Anderson, J. J.
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
1993-05-01
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
567-573
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2022331330
Cited by
987
References
19
FWCI
10.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of weight and body mass index on bone mineral density in men and women: The framingham study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbmr.5650080507
The paper
Felson, D. T., Zhang, Y., Hannan, M. T., & Anderson, J. J. (1993). Effects of weight and body mass index on bone mineral density in men and women: The framingham study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650080507

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.