The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of resistance and endurance exercise on bone mineral status of young women: A randomized exercise intervention trial
Abstract
A substantial body of cross-sectional data and a smaller number of intervention trials generally justify optimism that regular physical activity benefits the skeleton. We conducted an 8 month controlled exercise trial in a group of healthy college women (mean age = 19.9 years) who were randomly assigned to a control group or to progressive training in jogging or weight lifting. We measured the following variables: bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine (L2–4) and right proximal femur using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, dynamic muscle strength using the 1-RM method, and endurance performance using the 1.5 mile walk/run field test. A total of 31 women completed the 8 month study. For women completing the study, compliance, defined as the percentage of workout sessions attended, was 97% for the runners (range 90–1009/0) and 92% (range 88–100%) for the weight trainers. Body weight increased by approximately 2 kg in all groups (p < 0.05). Weight training was associated with significant increases (p < 0.01) in muscle strength in all muscle groups. Improvement ranged from 10% for the deep back to 54% for the leg. No significant changes in strength scores were observed in the control or running groups. Aerobic performance improved only in the running group (16%, p < 0.01). Lumbar BMD increased (p < 0.05) in both runners (1.3 ± 1.6%) and weight trainers (1.2 ± 1.8%). These results did not differ from each other but were both significantly greater than results in control subjects, in whom bone mineral did not change. No measure of bone mineral at the proximal femur changed significantly in any group. These results demonstrate that 8 months of supervised progressive training in either running or resistance exercise modestly increases lumbar spine mineral in young women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physical Activity and Bone Health
Kohrt, W. M., Bloomfield, S. A., Little, K. D., Nelson, M. E., & Yingling, V. R. (2004) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000142662.21767.58 · Cited by 1,043
Wolff, I., van Croonenborg, J. J., Kemper, H. C. G., Kostense, P. J., & Twisk, J. W. R. (1999) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s001980050109 · Cited by 589
Exercise effects on bone mass in postmenopausal women are site-specific and load-dependent
Kerr, D., Morton, A., Dick, I., & Prince, R. (1996) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650110211 · Cited by 461
The Bare Bones of Sex: Part 1—Sex and Gender
Fausto‐Sterling, A. (2005) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/424932 · Cited by 437
Exercise and Bone Mass in Adults
Guadalupe-Grau, A., Fuentes, T., Guerra, B., & Calbet, J. A. L. (2009) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200939060-00002 · Cited by 397
Metadata
- Authors
- Snow-Harter, C., Bouxsein, M. L., Lewis, B. T., Carter, D. R., & Marcus, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-07-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 761-769
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2052585698
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of resistance and endurance exercise on bone mineral status of young women: A randomized exercise intervention trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbmr.5650070706
- The paper
- Snow-Harter, C., Bouxsein, M. L., Lewis, B. T., Carter, D. R., & Marcus, R. (1992). Effects of resistance and endurance exercise on bone mineral status of young women: A randomized exercise intervention trial. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650070706
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.