The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perspective how many women have osteoporosis?
Abstract
Osteoporosis is widely viewed as a major public health concern, but the exact magnitude of the problem is uncertain and likely to depend on how the condition is defined. Noninvasive bone mineral measurements can be used to define a state of heightened fracture risk (osteopenia), or the ultimate clinical manifestation of fracture can be assessed (established osteoporosis). If bone mineral measurements more than 2 standard deviations below the mean of young normal women represent osteopenia, then 45% of white women aged 50 years and over have the condition at one or more sites in the hip, spine, or forearm on the basis of population-based data from Rochester, Minnesota. A smaller proportion is affected at each specific skeletal site: 32% have bone mineral values this low in the lumbar spine, 29% in either of two regions in the proximal femur, and 26% in the midradius. Although this overall estimate is substantial, some other serious chronic diseases are almost as common. More importantly, low bone mass is associated with adverse health outcomes, especially fractures. The lifetime risk of any fracture of the hip, spine, or distal forearm is almost 40% in white women and 13% in white men from age 50 years onward. If the enormous costs associated with these fractures are to be reduced, increased attention must be given to the design and implementation of control programs directed at this major health problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Model of Lifetime Osteoporosis Impact
Chrischilles, E. A. (1991) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1991.00400100100017 · Cited by 467
Self-citation
Cited by
Professor Kanis, J. A., Melton, L. J., Christiansen, C., Johnston, C. C., & Khaltaev, N. (1994) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650090802 · Cited by 3,849
Osteoporosis: now and the future
Rachner, T. D., Khosla, S., & Hofbauer, L. C. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62349-5 · Cited by 2,696
Effect of Risedronate on the Risk of Hip Fracture in Elderly Women
McClung, M. R., Geusens, P., Miller, P. D., Zippel, H., Bensen, W. G., Roux, C., Adami, S., Fogelman, I., Diamond, T., Eastell, R., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200102013440503 · Cited by 1,918
Sex Steroids and the Construction and Conservation of the Adult Skeleton
Riggs, B. L., Khosla, S., & Melton, L. J. (2002) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.23.3.0465 · Cited by 1,846
Self-citationSchuit, S. C. E., van der Klift, M., Weel, A. E. A. M., de Laet, C. E. D. H., Burger, H., Seeman, E., Hofman, A., Uitterlinden, A. G., van Leeuwen, J. P. T. M., & Pols, H. A. P. (2004) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2003.10.001 · Cited by 1,651
Metadata
- Authors
- Dr. Melton, L. J., Chrischilles, E. A., Cooper, C., Lane, A. W., & Riggs, B. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-09-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1005-1010
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2015178646
- Cited by
- 1,400
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perspective how many women have osteoporosis? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbmr.5650070902
- The paper
- Dr. Melton, L. J., Chrischilles, E. A., Cooper, C., Lane, A. W., & Riggs, B. L. (1992). Perspective how many women have osteoporosis? Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650070902
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.