The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: Patient and phantom cross-calibration results
Abstract
The comparison of patient data among different dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners is complicated because no universally accepted cross-calibration procedure or standard currently exists. This study was performed under the auspices of the International DXA Standardization Committee to establish appropriate cross-calibration parameters. Posteroanterior (PA) lumbar spine measurements of 100 women, ages 20–80 years (mean 52.6 + 16, range of BMD = 0.4–1.6 g/cm2) were obtained on a Norland XR26 Mark II, a Lunar DPX-L, and a Hologic QDR 2000 densitometer using standard procedures (pencil beam mode for all three scanners). Area, BMC, and BMD results from the different scanners were compared for all patients. In addition, the European spine phantom (ESP) and the European spine phantom prototype (ESP prototype), as well as standard phantoms from all three manufacturers, were evaluated on the three systems. To achieve universal scanner calibration, we used the intercept and slope of the patient's correlations and the value of the middle vertebra of the ESP as a reference point in a series of standardization formulas, and we have expressed the results as sBMD (mg/cm2). The correlations of the patients' spinal BMD values were excellent for each of the three scanner pairs. The average absolute difference in patient spinal BMD values (L2–4) between Hologic and Norland was 0.012 g/cm2 (1.3%); it was 0.113 g/cm2 (11.7%) between Hologic and Lunar and 0.118 g/cm2 (12.2%) between Norland and Lunar. The phantoms' regression lines approximated those of the patient regression lines, and the phantoms with only one measurement point were very close to the patients' regression lines. After applying the standardization formulas, the average absolute differences for the 100 patients were 28 mg/cm2 (2.7%) for Hologic/Norland, 23 mg/cm2 (2.2%) for Hologic/Lunar, and 29 mg/cm2 (2.8%) for Norland/Lunar. Average BMD results for the patients before correction were 0.972 g/cm2 for Hologic, 1.100 g/cm2 for Lunar, and 0.969 g/cm2 for Norland. After correction, sBMD results for patients were 1045 mg/cm2 for Hologic, 1047 mg/cm2 for Lunar, and 1043 mg/cm2 for Norland. The standardization approach as performed in our study provided compatibility of DXA results obtained on different scanners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Papaioannou, A., Morin, S., Cheung, A. M., Atkinson, S., Brown, J. P., Feldman, S., Hanley, D. A., Hodsman, A., Jamal, S. A., Kaiser, S. M., et al. (2010) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.100771 · Cited by 1,749
Reginster, J.-Y., Minne, H. W., Sorensen, O. H., Hooper, M., Roux, C., Brandi, M. L., Lund, B., Ethgen, D., Pack, S., Roumagnac, I., et al. (2000) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s001980050010 · Cited by 1,580
Prevalence of low femoral bone density in older U.S. women from NHANES III
Looker, A. C., Johnston, C. C., Wahner, H. W., Dunn, W. L., Calvo, M. S., Harris, T. B., Heyse, S. P., & Lindsay, R. L. (1995) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650100517 · Cited by 1,379
Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: A need for a reference standard
Buckinx, F., Landi, F., Cesari, M., Fielding, R. A., Visser, M., Engelke, K., Maggi, S., Dennison, E., Al‐Daghri, N. M., Allepaerts, S., et al. (2018) · Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle · doi:10.1002/jcsm.12268 · Cited by 765
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Genant, H. K., Grampp, S., Glüer, C. C., Faulkner, K. G., Jergas, M., Engelke, K., Hagiwara, S., & van Kuijk, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-10-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1503-1514
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2115660903
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: Patient and phantom cross-calibration results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbmr.5650091002
- The paper
- Genant, H. K., Grampp, S., Glüer, C. C., Faulkner, K. G., Jergas, M., Engelke, K., Hagiwara, S., & van Kuijk, C. (1994). Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: Patient and phantom cross-calibration results. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650091002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.