Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Gymnasts exhibit higher bone mass than runners despite similar prevalence of amenorrhea and oligomenorrhea

Robinson, T.L., Snow-Harter, Christine, Taaffe, D.R., Gillis, D., Shaw, J., Marcus, R.·1995·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

Female athletes exhibit a higher prevalence of exercise-associated amenorrhea and oligomenorrhea compared with nonathletic women, and both conditions are related to reduced bone mineral density (BMD), particularly at the spine. This study investigated bone mass and oligomenorrhea and amenorrhea in two groups of competitive female athletes with different skeletal loading patterns: gymnasts and runners. Bone mineral density (g/cm2) of the femoral neck, lumbar spine (L2–4), and whole body was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (QDR-1000/W, Hologic Inc., Waltham, MA) in collegiate gymnasts (n = 21) and runners (n = 20), and nonathletic college women (n = 19). The runners and gymnasts had similar values for percent body fat (14.7 ± 2.2% and 15.6 ± 2.9%, respectively), which were lower (p < 0.001) than controls (223 ± 3.0%). Lean body mass (LBM) did not differ among the groups, but when adjusted for body surface area, gymnasts had a higher LBM/height2 (p = 0.0001) compared with runners and controls. Muscle strength was significantly greater (p < 0.05) in gymnasts for quadriceps, biceps, and hip adductor force, compared with runners and controls. Gymnasts had a significantly later menarche age (16.2 ± 1.7 years) compared with runners (14.4 ± 1.7 years) and controls (13.0 ± 1.2 years). The prevalence of oligo- and amenorrhea was 47% for gymnasts (6 amenorrheic, 4 oligomenorrheic), 30% for runners (3 amenorrheic, 3 oligomenorrheic), and 0% for controls. Furthermore, athletic groups had similar menstrual histories given the higher proportion of gymnasts who had experienced primary amenorrhea. When evaluated since menarche, however, runners had somewhat longer histories due to an earlier age at menarche and slightly older ages. Dietary calcium intake did not differ among groups, although mean values were below the RDA of 1200 mg/day. By athletic group, BMD at any site did not differ among women with amenorrhea versus oligomenorrhea versus eumenorrhea, although there was a trend for the regularly menstruating athletes in both groups to have slightly higher values. Lumbar spine BMD was lower (p = 0.0001) in runners (0.98 ± 0.11 g/cm2) compared with both gymnasts and controls (1.17 ± 0.13 and 1.11 ± 0.11 g/cm2, respectively). Femoral neck BMD differed among all groups (p = 0.0001): gymnasts = 1.09 ± 0.12 g/cm2 > controls = 0.97 ± 0.10 g/cm2 > runners = 0.88 ± 0.11 g/cm2. Whole body BMD was lower (p < 0.01) in runners (1.04 ± 0.06 g/cm2) compared with gymnasts and controls (1.11 ± 0.08 and 1.09 ± 0.06 g/cm2, respectively). When adjusted for estimated bone size, lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral apparent density (BMAD, g/cm3) differed (p = 0.0001) among all groups: gymnasts > controls > runners. In conclusion: (1) gymnasts exhibited higher femoral neck BMD than runners and controls as well as a later age at menarche and a slightly higher (nonsignificant) prevalence of oligo-and amenorrhea; (2) runners exhibited lower BMD values compared with gymnasts despite similar current and historical menstrual cycle patterns; and (3) the mechanical forces generated from high impact loading and muscular contraction during gymnastics training have powerful osteogenic effects, which appear to counteract the increased bone resorption that has been shown to result from oligo- and amenorrhea.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jbmr.5650100107

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Robinson, T. L., Snow-Harter, C., Taaffe, D. R., Gillis, D., Shaw, J., & Marcus, R.
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
1995-01-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
26-35
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2004666994
Cited by
328
References
0
FWCI
18.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.