The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Calvarial and limb bone cells in organ and monolayer culture do not show the same early responses to dynamic mechanical strain
Abstract
Responses to mechanical strain in calvaria and limb bone organ cultures were compared by measuring cellular glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activity in situ and prostaglandin release. Normal functional strains were recorded in the ulnae (1000 μϵ) and calvarium (30 μϵ) in vivo in 110 g rats. Organ cultures of ulnae and calvaria from similar animals were loaded to produce dynamic strains (600 cycles, 1 Hz) of 1000 μϵ in the ulna, and 100 or 1000 μϵ in calvaria. In ulnae, both PGE2 and PGI2 were released and resident osteocytes and osteoblasts showed increased G6PD activity. Neither response was seen in calvaria. However, exogenous PGI2 (10−5−10−9 M) stimulated G6PD activity in osteocytes and osteoblasts in organ cultures of both calvaria and ulnae. In ulnar cells the response was linear, in calvarial cells it was biphasic with maximum activity at 10−7 M. Osteoblasts derived from ulnae and cultured on plastic plates subjected to dynamic strain (600 cycles, 1 Hz, 4000 μϵ) showed increased G6PD activity. There was no such response in similarly treated calvarial-derived cells. Calvarial bone cells differ from those of the ulna in that they do not respond to physiological strains in their locality with increased prostanoid release or G6PD activity either in situ or when seeded onto dynamically strained plastic plates. Cells from both sites in organ culture show increased G6PD activity in response to exogenous PGI2, but their dose: Responses differ in shape. These differences may reflect the extent to which functional loading influences bone architecture in these two sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bone's mechanostat: A 2003 update
Frost, H. M. (2003) · The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1002/ar.a.10119 · Cited by 1,535
Manolagas, S. C. (2002) · Recent Progress in Hormone Research · doi:10.1210/rp.57.1.385 · Cited by 517
Mechanical Strain and Bone Cell Function: A Review
Ehrlich, P. J., & Lanyon, L. E. (2002) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s001980200095 · Cited by 512
Self-citationMosley, J. R., & Lanyon, L. E. (1998) · Bone · doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(98)00113-6 · Cited by 414
Self-citationGroup III metabotropic glutamate receptors in rat cultured calvarial osteoblasts
Hinoi, E., Fujimori, S., Nakamura, Y., & Yoneda, Y. (2001) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.4355 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Rawlinson, S. C. F., Mosley, J. R., Suswillo, R. F. L., Pitsillides, A. A., & Lanyon, L. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-08-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1225-1232
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2100436400
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Calvarial and limb bone cells in organ and monolayer culture do not show the same early responses to dynamic mechanical strain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jbmr.5650100813
- The paper
- Rawlinson, S. C. F., Mosley, J. R., Suswillo, R. F. L., Pitsillides, A. A., & Lanyon, L. E. (1995). Calvarial and limb bone cells in organ and monolayer culture do not show the same early responses to dynamic mechanical strain. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650100813
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.