The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Safety and efficacy of granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis in patients with active ulcerative colitis: A multicenter study
Abstract
Active ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by activation and infiltration of granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages into the colonic mucosa. The infiltrated leukocytes can cause mucosal damage by releasing degradative proteases, reactive oxygen derivatives, and proinflammatory cytokines. The aim of this trial (conducted in 14 specialist centers) was to assess safety and efficacy of granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis in patients with active UC most of whom were refractory to conventional drug therapy. We used a new adsorptive type extracorporeal column (G‐1 Adacolumn) filled with cellulose acetate beads (carriers) of 2 mm in diameter, which selectively adsorb granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages. Patients (n = 53) received five apheresis sessions, each of 60 minutes duration, flow rate 30 ml per minute for 5 consecutive weeks in combination with 24.4 ± 3.60 mg prednisolone (mean ± SE per patient per day, baseline dose). During 60 minutes apheresis, 26% of granulocytes, 19.5% of monocytes and 2% of lymphocytes adsorbed to the carriers. At week 7, 58.5% of patients had remission or improved, the dose of prednisolone was reduced to 14.2 ± 2.25 mg (n = 37). The apheresis treatment was fairly safe, only eight non‐severe side effects (in 5 patients) were reported. Based on our results, we believe that in patients with active severe UC, patients who are refractory to conventional drugs, granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis is a useful adjunct to conventional therapy. This procedure should have the potential to allow tapering the dose of corticosteroids, shorten the time to remission and delay relapse. J. Clin. Apheresis. 16:1‐9, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Enhanced synthesis of leukotriene B4 by colonic mucosa in inflammatory bowel disease
Sharon, P., & Stenson, W. F. (1984) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(84)80015-3 · Cited by 738
Cited by
Inflammatory bowel disease: clinical aspects and established and evolving therapies
Baumgart, D. C., & Sandborn, W. J. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60751-x · Cited by 1,920
Szczepiorkowski, Z. M., Winters, J. L., Bandarenko, N., Kim, H. C., Linenberger, M. L., Marques, M. B., Sarode, R., Schwartz, J., Weinstein, R., & Shaz, B. H. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Apheresis · doi:10.1002/jca.20240 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Shimoyama, T., Sawada, K., Hiwatashi, N., Sawada, T., Matsueda, K., Munakata, A., Asakura, H., Tanaka, T., Kasukawa, R., Kimura, K., Suzuki, Y., Nagamachi, Y., Muto, T., Nagawa, H., Iizuka, B., Baba, S., Nasu, M., Kataoka, T., Kashiwagi, N., & Saniabadi, A. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Apheresis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 0733-2459 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1101
- OpenAlex
- W2143904760
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety and efficacy of granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis in patients with active ulcerative colitis: A multicenter study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jca.1000
- The paper
- Shimoyama, T., Sawada, K., Hiwatashi, N., Sawada, T., Matsueda, K., Munakata, A., Asakura, H., Tanaka, T., Kasukawa, R., Kimura, K., Suzuki, Y., Nagamachi, Y., Muto, T., Nagawa, H., Iizuka, B., Baba, S., Nasu, M., Kataoka, T., Kashiwagi, N., & Saniabadi, A. R. (2001). Safety and efficacy of granulocyte and monocyte adsorption apheresis in patients with active ulcerative colitis: A multicenter study. Journal of Clinical Apheresis. https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.1000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.