The DOI matches its Crossref record; 386 of the 386 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice—Evidence‐based approach from the apheresis applications committee of the American Society for Apheresis
Abstract
The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Apheresis Applications Committee is charged with a review and categorization of indications for therapeutic apheresis. Beginning with the 2007 ASFA Special Issue (fourth edition), the subcommittee has incorporated systematic review and evidence‐based approach in the grading and categorization of indications. This Fifth ASFA Special Issue has further improved the process of using evidence‐based medicine in the recommendations by refining the category definitions and by adding a grade of recommendation based on widely accepted GRADE system. The concept of a fact sheet was introduced in the Fourth edition and is only slightly modified in this current edition. The fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis. The article consists of 59 fact sheets devoted to each disease entity currently categorized by the ASFA as category I through III. Category IV indications are also listed. J. Clin. Apheresis, 2010. © 2010 American Society for Apheresis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
(2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490 · Cited by 8,477
A novel MHC class I-like gene is mutated in patients with hereditary haemochromatosis
Feder, J. N., Gnirke, A., Thomas, W., Tsuchihashi, Z., Ruddy, D. A., Basava, A., Dormishian, F., Domingo, R., Ellis, M. C., Fullan, A., et al. (1996) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0896-399 · Cited by 3,664
Loftus, E. V. (2004) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.01.063 · Cited by 3,117
Noseworthy, J. H., Lucchinetti, C., Rodriguez, M., & Weinshenker, B. G. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200009283431307 · Cited by 2,899
Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine
Somberg, J. (2005) · American Journal of Therapeutics · doi:10.1097/01.mjt.0000179344.69594.75 · Cited by 2,128
Wormser, G. P., Dattwyler, R. J., Shapiro, E. D., Halperin, J. J., Steere, A. C., Klempner, M. S., Krause, P. J., Bakken, J. S., Strle, F., Stanek, G., et al. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/508667 · Cited by 2,087
Rock, G. A., Shumak, K. H., Buskard, N. A., Blanchette, V. S., Kelton, J. G., Nair, R. C., & Spasoff, R. A. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108083250604 · Cited by 1,920
Adams, R. J., McKie, V. C., Hsu, L., Files, B., Vichinsky, E., Pegelow, C., Abboud, M., Gallagher, D., Kutlar, A., Nichols, F. T., et al. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199807023390102 · Cited by 1,866
Antibodies to von Willebrand Factor–Cleaving Protease in Acute Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Tsai, H.-M., & Lian, E. C.-Y. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199811263392203 · Cited by 1,760
Cited by
Gidding, S. S., Ann Champagne, M., de Ferranti, S. D., Defesche, J., Ito, M. K., Knowles, J. W., McCrindle, B., Raal, F., Rader, D., Santos, R. D., et al. (2015) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000297 · Cited by 723
A Comparative View on Human Somatic Cell Sources for iPSC Generation
Raab, S., Klingenstein, M., Liebau, S., & Linta, L. (2014) · Stem Cells International · doi:10.1155/2014/768391 · Cited by 263
LDL-Apheresis: Technical and Clinical Aspects
Bambauer, R., Bambauer, C., Lehmann, B., Latza, R., & Schiel, R. (2012) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1100/2012/314283 · Cited by 91
The Role of Plasmapheresis in Critical Illness
Nguyen, T. C., Kiss, J. E., Goldman, J. R., & Carcillo, J. A. (2012) · Critical Care Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ccc.2012.04.009 · Cited by 83
Plasmapheresis as treatment for hyperlipidemic pancreatitis
Ramírez-Bueno, A., Salazar-Ramírez, C., Cota-Delgado, F., de la Torre-Prados, M. V., & Valdivielso, P. (2014) · European Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2013.08.701 · Cited by 65
“Due to the lack of controlled and randomized trials in this field, the American Society for Apheresis' recommendation for the procedures is only Grade 2C [18].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Szczepiorkowski, Z. M., Winters, J. L., Bandarenko, N., Kim, H. C., Linenberger, M. L., Marques, M. B., Sarode, R., Schwartz, J., Weinstein, R., & Shaz, B. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Apheresis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 83-177
- ISSN
- 0733-2459 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1101
- OpenAlex
- W4242908792
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 386
- FWCI
- 60.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice—Evidence‐based approach from the apheresis applications committee of the American Society for Apheresis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jca.20240
- The paper
- Szczepiorkowski, Z. M., Winters, J. L., Bandarenko, N., Kim, H. C., Linenberger, M. L., Marques, M. B., Sarode, R., Schwartz, J., Weinstein, R., & Shaz, B. H. (2010). Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice—Evidence‐based approach from the apheresis applications committee of the American Society for Apheresis. Journal of Clinical Apheresis. https://doi.org/10.1002/jca.20240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
