Cited by 167Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsEducational Research and Methods

Promoting Rigorous Research: Generalizability and Qualitative Research

Hays, Danica G., McKibben, W. Bradley·2021·Journal of Counseling & Development

Abstract

Although generalizability is not typically considered a feature or goal of qualitative research, it is an integral part of applying findings to advance knowledge in the counseling profession. First, we describe types of generalizability, the use of trustworthiness criteria, and strategies for maximizing generalizability within and across studies, then we discuss how the research approaches of grounded theory, autoethnography, content analysis, and metasynthesis can yield greater generalizability of findings. We then describe six phases for aggregating qualitative research to conduct a metasynthesis, which can be applied as relevant to the metastudy approaches of formal grounded theory, autoethnography, and content analysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcad.12365

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Generalizability is an integral part of qualitative research.

    “It is worth mentioning that generalizability is also an integral part of qualitative research (Hays & McKibben, 2021).”

    From Criteria for Good Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as Hays & McKibben, 2021

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 167

Authors
Hays, D. G., & McKibben, W. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • Nova Southeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Hays, Danica G.
Venue
Journal of Counseling & Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-03-08
Volume
99
Issue
2
Pages
178-188
ISSN
  • 0748-9633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6676
OpenAlex
W3133655119
Cited by
167
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8
FWCI
35.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Counseling & Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
Keywords
generalizability, qualitative research, trustworthiness, meta-synthesis, grounded theory, autoethnography, content analysis, counseling research, research rigor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review