Promoting Rigorous Research: Generalizability and Qualitative Research
Abstract
Although generalizability is not typically considered a feature or goal of qualitative research, it is an integral part of applying findings to advance knowledge in the counseling profession. First, we describe types of generalizability, the use of trustworthiness criteria, and strategies for maximizing generalizability within and across studies, then we discuss how the research approaches of grounded theory, autoethnography, content analysis, and metasynthesis can yield greater generalizability of findings. We then describe six phases for aggregating qualitative research to conduct a metasynthesis, which can be applied as relevant to the metastudy approaches of formal grounded theory, autoethnography, and content analysis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Generalizability is an integral part of qualitative research.
“It is worth mentioning that generalizability is also an integral part of qualitative research (Hays & McKibben, 2021).”
From Criteria for Good Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as Hays & McKibben, 2021
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 167
- Authors
- Hays, D. G., & McKibben, W. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
- Nova Southeastern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hays, Danica G.
- Venue
- Journal of Counseling & Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-03-08
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 178-188
- ISSN
- 0748-9633 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-6676
- OpenAlex
- W3133655119
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 35.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Counseling & Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Keywords
- generalizability, qualitative research, trustworthiness, meta-synthesis, grounded theory, autoethnography, content analysis, counseling research, research rigor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review