Cited by 62Spaceflight effects on biologyBone Metabolism and DiseasesBone health and osteoporosis research

Microarray profile of gene expression during osteoclast differentiation in modelled microgravity

Sambandam, Yuvaraj, Blanchard, Jeremy J., Daughtridge, Giffin, Kolb, Robert J., Shanmugarajan, Srinivasan, Pandruvada, Subramanya N. M., Bateman, Ted A., Reddy, Sakamuri V.·2010·Journal of Cellular Biochemistry

Abstract

Microgravity (µXg) leads to a 10-15% loss of bone mass in astronauts during space flight. Osteoclast (OCL) is the multinucleated bone-resorbing cell. In this study, we used the NASA developed ground-based rotating wall vessel bioreactor (RWV), rotary cell culture system (RCCS) to simulate µXg conditions and demonstrated a significant increase (2-fold) in osteoclastogenesis compared to normal gravity control (Xg). Gene expression profiling of RAW 264.7 OCL progenitor cells in modelled µXg by Agilent microarray analysis revealed significantly increased expression of critical molecules such as cytokines/growth factors, proteases and signalling proteins, which play an important role in enhanced OCL differentiation/function. Transcription factors such as c-Jun, MITF and CREB implicated in OCL differentiation are upregulated; however no significant change in the levels of NFATc1 expression in preosteoclast cells subjected to modelled µXg. We also identified high-level expression of calcium-binding protein, S100A8 (calcium-binding protein molecule A8/calgranulin A) in preosteoclast cells under µXg. Furthermore, modelled µXg stimulated RAW 264.7 cells showed elevated cytosolic calcium (Ca(2+)) levels/oscillations compared to Xg cells. siRNA knock-down of S100A8 expression in RAW 264.7 cells resulted in a significant decrease in modelled µXg stimulated OCL differentiation. We also identified elevated levels of phospho-CREB in preosteoclast cells subjected to modelled µXg compared to X…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcb.22840

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conditions of microgravity and simulated microgravity decrease osteoblastogenesis and osteoblast secretion of OPG.

    “decrease osteoblastogenesis and osteoblast secretion of OPG”

    From Osteoclasts and Microgravity (2020) · cites this paper as [66]

  • Conditions of microgravity and simulated microgravity decrease the mineral content and cortical and trabecular microstructures of bone.

    “conditions of microgravity and simulated microgravity decrease the mineral content and cortical and trabecular microstructures of bone”

    From Osteoclasts and Microgravity (2020) · cites this paper as [66]

  • Simulated microgravity upregulated production/expression of factors involved in osteoclastogenesis, including cytokines, growth factors, proteases, signaling proteins, and transcription factors c-Jun, MITF, and CREB, compared to ground controls.

    “upregulated the production/expression of factors involved in osteoclastogenesis, including cytokines, growth factors, proteases, signaling proteins, and transcription factors c-Jun, MITF, and CREB as compared to ground controls [66]”

    From Osteoclasts and Microgravity (2020) · cites this paper as [66]

  • Conditions of microgravity and simulated microgravity increase osteoclast secretion of sclerostin.

    “increase osteoclast secretion of sclerostin”

    From Osteoclasts and Microgravity (2020) · cites this paper as [66]

  • Simulated microgravity increased osteoclastogenesis by twofold in RAW 264.7 osteoclast progenitor cells compared to ground controls.

    “Sambandam and associates found that simulated microgravity increased osteoclastogenesis by twofold”

    From Osteoclasts and Microgravity (2020) · cites this paper as [66]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sambandam, Y., Blanchard, J. J., Daughtridge, G., Kolb, R. J., Shanmugarajan, S., Pandruvada, S. N. M., Bateman, T. A., & Reddy, S. V.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Clemson University (US)
Corresponding author
Reddy, Sakamuri V.
Venue
Journal of Cellular Biochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-29
Volume
111
Issue
5
Pages
1179-1187
ISSN
  • 0730-2312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-4644
OpenAlex
W1992401482
Cited by
62
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cellular Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
osteoclastogenesis, microgravity, simulated microgravity, rotating wall vessel bioreactor, RAW 264.7 macrophages, S100A8, calcium-binding proteins, intracellular calcium, CREB phosphorylation, c-Jun, MITF, NFATc1, gene expression profiling, bone resorption, spaceflight bone loss
MeSH terms
Animals, Bone Resorption, Cell Differentiation, Cell Line, Macrophages, Models, Biological, Osteoclasts, Space Flight, Weightlessness, Astronauts, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Fractures, Bone, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review