Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 307

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of a polarizable force field for proteins via ab initio quantum chemistry: First generation model and gas phase tests

Open access
Kaminski, George A., Stern, Harry A., Berne, B. J., Friesner, Richard A., Cao, Yixiang X., Murphy, Robert B., Zhou, Ruhong, Halgren, Thomas A.·2002·Journal of Computational Chemistry

Abstract

We present results of developing a methodology suitable for producing molecular mechanics force fields with explicit treatment of electrostatic polarization for proteins and other molecular system of biological interest. The technique allows simulation of realistic‐size systems. Employing high‐level ab initio data as a target for fitting allows us to avoid the problem of the lack of detailed experimental data. Using the fast and reliable quantum mechanical methods supplies robust fitting data for the resulting parameter sets. As a result, gas‐phase many‐body effects for dipeptides are captured within the average RMSD of 0.22 kcal/mol from their ab initio values, and conformational energies for the di‐ and tetrapeptides are reproduced within the average RMSD of 0.43 kcal/mol from their quantum mechanical counterparts. The latter is achieved in part because of application of a novel torsional fitting technique recently developed in our group, which has already been used to greatly improve accuracy of the peptide conformational equilibrium prediction with the OPLS‐AA force field.1 Finally, we have employed the newly developed first‐generation model in computing gas‐phase conformations of real proteins, as well as in molecular dynamics studies of the systems. The results show that, although the overall accuracy is no better than what can be achieved with a fixed‐charges model, the methodology produces robust results, permits reasonably low computational cost, and avoids other computational problems typical for polarizable force fields. It can be considered as a solid basis for building a more accurate and complete second‐generation model. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 23: 1515–1531, 2002

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcc.10125

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 307

Metadata

Authors
Kaminski, G. A., Stern, H. A., Berne, B. J., Friesner, R. A., Cao, Y. X., Murphy, R. B., Zhou, R., & Halgren, T. A.
Venue
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10-15
Volume
23
Issue
16
Pages
1515-1531
ISSN
  • 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-987X
OpenAlex
W2137322489
Cited by
307
References
1
FWCI
5.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of a polarizable force field for proteins via ab initio quantum chemistry: First generation model and gas phase tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.10125
The paper
Kaminski, G. A., Stern, H. A., Berne, B. J., Friesner, R. A., Cao, Y. X., Murphy, R. B., Zhou, R., & Halgren, T. A. (2002). Development of a polarizable force field for proteins via ab initio quantum chemistry: First generation model and gas phase tests. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.10125

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.