The DOI matches its Crossref record.
AGBNP: An analytic implicit solvent model suitable for molecular dynamics simulations and high‐resolution modeling
Abstract
We have developed an implicit solvent effective potential (AGBNP) that is suitable for molecular dynamics simulations and high‐resolution modeling. It is based on a novel implementation of the pairwise descreening Generalized Born model for the electrostatic component and a new nonpolar hydration free energy estimator. The nonpolar term consists of an estimator for the solute‐solvent van der Waals dispersion energy designed to mimic the continuum solvent solute‐solvent van der Waals interaction energy, in addition to a surface area term corresponding to the work of cavity formation. AGBNP makes use of a new parameter‐free algorithm to calculate the scaling coefficients used in the pairwise descreening scheme to take into account atomic overlaps. The same algorithm is also used to calculate atomic surface areas. We show that excellent agreement is achieved for the GB self‐energies and surface areas in comparison to accurate, but much more expensive, numerical evaluations. The parameter‐free approach used in AGBNP and the sensitivity of the AGBNP model with respect to large and small conformational changes makes the model suitable for high‐resolution modeling of protein loops and receptor sites as well as high‐resolution prediction of the structure and thermodynamics of protein‐ligand complexes. We present illustrative results for these kinds of benchmarks. The model is fully analytical with first derivatives and is computationally efficient. It has been incorporated into the IMPACT molecular simulation program. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 25: 479–499, 2004
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
Computational design of antibody-affinity improvement beyond in vivo maturation
Lippow, S. M., Wittrup, K. D., & Tidor, B. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1336 · Cited by 342
Xia, J., Deng, N.-J., & Levy, R. M. (2013) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp400797y · Cited by 29
Self-citationElder, L. H., & Onufriev, A. V. (2025) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c02263 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallicchio, E., & Levy, R. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-01-06
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 479-499
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- OpenAlex
- W2171891719
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.