The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Development and testing of a general amber force field
Abstract
We describe here a general Amber force field (GAFF) for organic molecules. GAFF is designed to be compatible with existing Amber force fields for proteins and nucleic acids, and has parameters for most organic and pharmaceutical molecules that are composed of H, C, N, O, S, P, and halogens. It uses a simple functional form and a limited number of atom types, but incorporates both empirical and heuristic models to estimate force constants and partial atomic charges. The performance of GAFF in test cases is encouraging. In test I, 74 crystallographic structures were compared to GAFF minimized structures, with a root‐mean‐square displacement of 0.26 Å, which is comparable to that of the Tripos 5.2 force field (0.25 Å) and better than those of MMFF 94 and CHARMm (0.47 and 0.44 Å, respectively). In test II, gas phase minimizations were performed on 22 nucleic acid base pairs, and the minimized structures and intermolecular energies were compared to MP2/6‐31G* results. The RMS of displacements and relative energies were 0.25 Å and 1.2 kcal/mol, respectively. These data are comparable to results from Parm99/RESP (0.16 Å and 1.18 kcal/mol, respectively), which were parameterized to these base pairs. Test III looked at the relative energies of 71 conformational pairs that were used in development of the Parm99 force field. The RMS error in relative energies (compared to experiment) is about 0.5 kcal/mol. GAFF can be applied to wide range of molecules in an automatic fashion, making it suitable for rational drug design and database searching. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 25: 1157–1174, 2004
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Charifson P. S., 1997, Practical Application of Computer‐Aided Drug Design
- Leach A. R., 2001, Molecular Modelling. Principles and Applications
- Cramer C. J., 2002, Essentials of Computational Chemistry: Theories and Models
- Kollman P. A., 2003, Burger's Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery, 169, 10.1002/0471266949.bmc004 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja00315a051 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.540070216 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ja00124a002 · DOI
- 10.1002/1096-987X(200009)21:12<1049::AID-JCC3>3.0.CO;2-F · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199604)17:5/6<490::AID-JCC1>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.540120208 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199604)17:5/6<642::AID-JCC6>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.540100804 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.540110405 · DOI
- 10.1016/0040-4039(93)88034-G · DOI
- Jorgensen W. L., 1998, Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry, 1986
- 10.1021/j100142a004 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja00074a030 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.1079 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.540161106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199603)17:4<429::AID-JCC5>3.0.CO;2-W · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(19970715)18:9<1136::AID-JCC3>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(20000130)21:2<132::AID-JCC5>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.10128 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.555605 · DOI
- Allen F. H., 1987, J Chem Soc Perkin Trans II, 1
- 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199604)17:5/6<490::AID-JCC1>3.0.CO;2-P · DOI
- Frisch M. J., 1998, Gaussian 98 (Revision A.9)
- Case D. A., 2002, AMBER 7
Cited by
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
Self-citationWang, L., Wu, Y., Deng, Y., Kim, B., Pierce, L., Krilov, G., Lupyan, D., Robinson, S., Dahlgren, M. K., Greenwood, J., et al. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja512751q · Cited by 1,313
Macromolecular modeling and design in Rosetta: recent methods and frameworks
Leman, J. K., Weitzner, B. D., Lewis, S. M., Adolf-Bryfogle, J., Alam, N., Alford, R. F., Aprahamian, M., Baker, D., Barlow, K. A., Barth, P., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-020-0848-2 · Cited by 888
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P. A., & Case, D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-04-13
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1157-1174
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- OpenAlex
- W2147993766
- Cited by
- 19,506
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 82.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and testing of a general amber force field. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.20035
- The paper
- Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P. A., & Case, D. A. (2004). Development and testing of a general amber force field. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.