The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Importance of accurate charges in molecular docking: Quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) approach
Open accessAbstract
The extent to which accuracy of electric charges plays a role in protein‐ligand docking is investigated through development of a docking algorithm, which incorporates quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) calculations. In this algorithm, fixed charges of ligands obtained from force field parameterization are replaced by QM/MM calculations in the protein environment, treating only the ligands as the quantum region. The algorithm is tested on a set of 40 cocrystallized structures taken from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and provides strong evidence that use of nonfixed charges is important. An algorithm, dubbed “Survival of the Fittest” (SOF) algorithm, is implemented to incorporate QM/MM charge calculations without any prior knowledge of native structures of the complexes. Using an iterative protocol, this algorithm is able in many cases to converge to a nativelike structure in systems where redocking of the ligand using a standard fixed charge force field exhibits nontrivial errors. The results demonstrate that polarization effects can play a significant role in determining the structures of protein‐ligand complexes, and provide a promising start towards the development of more accurate docking methods for lead optimization applications. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 26: 915–931, 2005
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Friesner, R. A., Banks, J. L., Murphy, R. B., Halgren, T. A., Klicic, J. J., Mainz, D. T., Repasky, M. P., Knoll, E. H., Shelley, M., Perry, J. K., et al. (2004) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm0306430 · Cited by 10,057
Self-citation
Cited by
Acin-Perez, R., Gatti, D. L., Bai, Y., & Manfredi, G. (2011) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2011.03.024 · Cited by 190
Robust scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions with quantum chemical charge models.
Wang, J.-C., Lin, J.-H., Chen, C.-M., Perryman, A. L., & Olson, A. J. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci200220v · Cited by 54
On-the-fly QM/MM docking with attracting cavities.
Chaskar, P., Zoete, V., & Röhrig, U. F. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00406 · Cited by 46
Nuti, R., Gargaro, M., Matino, D., Dolciami, D., Grohmann, U., Puccetti, P., Fallarino, F., & Macchiarulo, A. (2014) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci5005459 · Cited by 45
Bostancioglu, S. M., & Mutlu, O. (2025) · Parasitology Research · doi:10.1007/s00436-024-08433-5 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Cho, A. E., Guallar, V., Berne, B. J., & Friesner, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-04-19
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 915-931
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- OpenAlex
- W1996840082
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.