The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An iterative knowledge‐based scoring function to predict protein–ligand interactions: I. Derivation of interaction potentials
Abstract
Using a novel iterative method, we have developed a knowledge‐based scoring function (ITScore) to predict protein–ligand interactions. The pair potentials for ITScore were derived from a training set of 786 protein–ligand complex structures in the Protein Data Bank. Twenty‐six atom types were used based on the atom type category of the SYBYL software. The iterative method circumvents the long‐standing reference state problem in the derivation of knowledge‐based scoring functions. The basic idea is to improve pair potentials by iteration until they correctly discriminate experimentally determined binding modes from decoy ligand poses for the ligand‐protein complexes in the training set. The iterative method is efficient and normally converges within 20 iterative steps. The scoring function based on the derived potentials was tested on a diverse set of 140 protein–ligand complexes for affinity prediction, yielding a high correlation coefficient of 0.74. Because ITScore uses SYBYL‐defined atom types, this scoring function is easy to use for molecular files prepared by SYBYL or converted by software such as BABEL. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2006
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A model binding site for testing scoring functions in molecular docking.
Wei, B. Q., Baase, W. A., Weaver, L. H., Matthews, B. W., & Shoichet, B. K. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00777-5 · Cited by 237
Cited by
Perspective: Coarse-grained models for biomolecular systems
Noid, W. G. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4818908 · Cited by 893
Huang, S.-Y., Grinter, S. Z., & Zou, X. (2010) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c0cp00151a · Cited by 508
Huang, S., & Zou, X. (2007) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.21214 · Cited by 401
Self-citationBinding MOAD (Mother Of All Databases)
Hu, L., Benson, M. L., Smith, R. D., Lerner, M. G., & Carlson, H. A. (2005) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.20512 · Cited by 328
Cang, Z., & Wei, G.-W. (2017) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005690 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, S., & Zou, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-09-18
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1866-1875
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- OpenAlex
- W2105527266
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An iterative knowledge‐based scoring function to predict protein–ligand interactions: I. Derivation of interaction potentials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.20504
- The paper
- Huang, S., & Zou, X. (2006). An iterative knowledge‐based scoring function to predict protein–ligand interactions: I. Derivation of interaction potentials. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20504
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.