Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computational alanine scanning mutagenesis—An improved methodological approach

Moreira, Irina S., Fernandes, Pedro A., Ramos, Maria J.·2007·Journal of Computational Chemistry

Abstract

Alanine scanning mutagenesis of protein–protein interfacial residues can be applied to a wide variety of protein complexes to understand the structural and energetic characteristics of the hot‐spots. Binding free energies have been estimated with reasonable accuracy with empirical methods, such as Molecular Mechanics/Poisson‐Boltzmann surface area (MM‐PBSA), and with more rigorous computational approaches like Free Energy Perturbation (FEP) and Thermodynamic Integration (TI). The main objective of this work is the development of an improved methodological approach, with less computational cost, that predicts accurately differences in binding free energies between the wild‐type and alanine mutated complexes (ΔΔ Gbinding). The method was applied to three complexes, and a mean unsigned error of 0.80 kcal/mol was obtained in a set of 46 mutations. The computational method presented here achieved an overall success rate of 80% and an 82% success rate in residues for which alanine mutation causes an increase in the binding free energy > 2.0 kcal/mol (warm‐ and hot‐spots). This fully atomistic computational methodological approach consists in a computational Molecular Dynamics simulation protocol performed in a continuum medium using the Generalized Born model. A set of three different internal dielectric constants, to mimic the different degree of relaxation of the interface when different types of amino acids are mutated for alanine, have to be used for the proteins, depending on the type of amino acid that is mutated. This method permits a systematic scanning mutagenesis of protein–protein interfaces and it is capable of anticipating the experimental results of mutagenesis, thus guiding new experimental investigations. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 28: 644–654, 2007

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcc.20566

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Moreira, I. S., Fernandes, P. A., & Ramos, M. J.
Venue
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-12-28
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
644-654
ISSN
  • 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-987X
OpenAlex
W2098888753
Cited by
273
References
50
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational alanine scanning mutagenesis—An improved methodological approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.20566
The paper
Moreira, I. S., Fernandes, P. A., & Ramos, M. J. (2007). Computational alanine scanning mutagenesis—An improved methodological approach. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20566

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.