The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spin‐component‐scaled double hybrids: An extensive search for the best fifth‐rung functionals blending DFT and perturbation theory
Abstract
Following up on an earlier preliminary communication (Kozuch and Martin, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 20104), we report here in detail on an extensive search for the most accurate spin‐component‐scaled double hybrid functionals [of which conventional double hybrids (DHs) are a special case]. Such fifth‐rung functionals approach the performance of composite ab initio methods such as G3 theory at a fraction of their computational cost, and with analytical derivatives available. In this article, we provide a critical analysis of the variables and components that maximize the accuracy of DHs. These include the selection of the exchange and correlation functionals, the coefficients of each component [density functional theory (DFT), exact exchange, and perturbative correlation in both the same spin and opposite spin terms], and the addition of an ad‐hoc dispersion correction; we have termed these parametrizations “DSD‐DFT” (Dispersion corrected, Spin‐component scaled, Double‐hybrid DFT). Somewhat surprisingly, the quality of DSD‐DFT is only mildly dependent on the underlying DFT exchange and correlation components, with even DSD‐LDA yielding respectable performance. Simple, nonempirical GGAs appear to work best, whereas meta‐GGAs offer no advantage (with the notable exception of B95c). The best correlation components appear to be, in that order, B95c, P86, and PBEc, while essentially any good GGA exchange yields nearly identical results. On further validation with a wider variety of thermochemical, weak interaction, kinetic, and spectroscopic benchmarks, we find that the best functionals are, roughly in that order, DSD‐PBEhB95, DSD‐PBEP86, DSD‐PBEPW91, and DSD‐PBEPBE. In addition, DSD‐PBEP86 and DSD‐PBEPBE can be used without source code modifications in a wider variety of electronic structure codes. Sample job decks for several commonly used such codes are supplied as electronic Supporting Information. Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory
Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S., & Goerigk, L. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21759 · Cited by 28,221
Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dispersion corrections
Chai, J.-D., & Head-Gordon, M. (2008) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b810189b · Cited by 14,648
Tkatchenko, A., & Scheffler, M. (2009) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.073005 · Cited by 6,286
Density functional theory with London dispersion corrections
Grimme, S. (2011) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.30 · Cited by 2,829
Cited by
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2017) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2017.1333644 · Cited by 2,307
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Density Functional Theory for Electrocatalysis
Liao, X., Lu, R., Xia, L., Liu, Q., Wang, H., Zhao, K., Wang, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2022) · ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL MATERIALS · doi:10.1002/eem2.12204 · Cited by 420
Double‐hybrid density functionals
Goerigk, L., & Grimme, S. (2014) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1193 · Cited by 396
Combining Wave Function Methods with Density Functional Theory for Excited States
Ghosh, S., Verma, P., Cramer, C. J., Gagliardi, L., & Truhlar, D. G. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00193 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Kozuch, S., & Martin, J. M. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08-26
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 2327-2344
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- OpenAlex
- W2041306940
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spin‐component‐scaled double hybrids: An extensive search for the best fifth‐rung functionals blending DFT and perturbation theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.23391
- The paper
- Kozuch, S., & Martin, J. M. L. (2013). Spin‐component‐scaled double hybrids: An extensive search for the best fifth‐rung functionals blending DFT and perturbation theory. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.