The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Best bang for your buck: GPU nodes for GROMACS biomolecular simulations
Open accessAbstract
The molecular dynamics simulation package GROMACS runs efficiently on a wide variety of hardware from commodity workstations to high performance computing clusters. Hardware features are well-exploited with a combination of single instruction multiple data, multithreading, and message passing interface (MPI)-based single program multiple data/multiple program multiple data parallelism while graphics processing units (GPUs) can be used as accelerators to compute interactions off-loaded from the CPU. Here, we evaluate which hardware produces trajectories with GROMACS 4.6 or 5.0 in the most economical way. We have assembled and benchmarked compute nodes with various CPU/GPU combinations to identify optimal compositions in terms of raw trajectory production rate, performance-to-price ratio, energy efficiency, and several other criteria. Although hardware prices are naturally subject to trends and fluctuations, general tendencies are clearly visible. Adding any type of GPU significantly boosts a node's simulation performance. For inexpensive consumer-class GPUs this improvement equally reflects in the performance-to-price ratio. Although memory issues in consumer-class GPUs could pass unnoticed as these cards do not support error checking and correction memory, unreliable GPUs can be sorted out with memory checking tools. Apart from the obvious determinants for cost-efficiency like hardware expenses and raw performance, the energy consumption of a node is a major cost factor. Over the typical hardware lifetime until replacement of a few years, the costs for electrical power and cooling can become larger than the costs of the hardware itself. Taking that into account, nodes with a well-balanced ratio of CPU and consumer-class GPU resources produce the maximum amount of GROMACS trajectory over their lifetime.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD
Phillips, J. C., Braun, R., Wang, W., Gumbart, J., Tajkhorshid, E., Villa, E., Chipot, C., Skeel, R. D., Kalé, L., & Schulten, K. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20289 · Cited by 16,914
Cited by
Heterogeneous parallelization and acceleration of molecular dynamics simulations in GROMACS
Páll, S., Zhmurov, A., Bauer, P., Abraham, M., Lundborg, M., Gray, A., Hess, B., & Lindahl, E. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0018516 · Cited by 940
Self-citationSeritan, S., Bannwarth, C., Fales, B. S., Hohenstein, E. G., Isborn, C. M., Kokkila‐Schumacher, S. I. L., Li, X., Liu, F., Luehr, N., Snyder, J. W., et al. (2021) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1494 · Cited by 312
Atomic resolution mechanism of ligand binding to a solvent inaccessible cavity in T4 lysozyme
(2018) · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006180 · Cited by 77
Mapping the Substrate Recognition Pathway in Cytochrome P450
(2018) · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b10840 · Cited by 60
ddcMD: A fully GPU-accelerated molecular dynamics program for the Martini force field
Zhang, X., Sundram, S., Oppelstrup, T., Kokkila-Schumacher, S. I. L., Carpenter, T. S., Ingólfsson, H. I., Streitz, F. H., Lightstone, F. C., & Glosli, J. N. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0014500 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Kutzner, C., Páll, S., Fechner, M., Esztermann, A., de Groot, B. L., & Grubmüller, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-08-04
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 1990-2008
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- OpenAlex
- W1895692106
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Best bang for your buck: GPU nodes for GROMACS biomolecular simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.24030
- The paper
- Kutzner, C., Páll, S., Fechner, M., Esztermann, A., de Groot, B. L., & Grubmüller, H. (2015). Best bang for your buck: GPU nodes for GROMACS biomolecular simulations. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.24030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.