Cited by 72Protein Structure and DynamicsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

OSPREY 3.0: Open-source protein redesign for you, with powerful new features

Open access
Hallen, Mark A., Martin, Jeffrey W., Ojewole, Adegoke, Jou, Jonathan D., Lowegard, Anna U., Frenkel, Marcel S., Gainza, Pablo, Nisonoff, Hunter M. +6 more·2018·Journal of Computational Chemistry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We present osprey 3.0, a new and greatly improved release of the osprey protein design software. Osprey 3.0 features a convenient new Python interface, which greatly improves its ease of use. It is over two orders of magnitude faster than previous versions of osprey when running the same algorithms on the same hardware. Moreover, osprey 3.0 includes several new algorithms, which introduce substantial speedups as well as improved biophysical modeling. It also includes GPU support, which provides an additional speedup of over an order of magnitude. Like previous versions of osprey, osprey 3.0 offers a unique package of advantages over other design software, including provable design algorithms that account for continuous flexibility during design and model conformational entropy. Finally, we show here empirically that osprey 3.0 accurately predicts the effect of mutations on protein-protein binding. Osprey 3.0 is available at http://www.cs.duke.edu/donaldlab/osprey.php as free and open-source software. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcc.25522

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [12]Georgiev I, Acharya P, Schmidt S, Li Y, Wycuff D, Ofek G, Doria-Rose N, Luongo T, Yang Y, Zhou T,, Retrovirology 9, P50 (2012).
  2. [18]Hallen MA, Jou JD, and Donald BR, in International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology (Springer, 2016), pp. 122– 136.
  3. [34]Doria-Rose NA, Altae-Tran HR, Roark RS, Schmidt SD, Sutton MS, Louder MK, Chuang GY, Bailer RT, Cortez V, Kong R,, PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006148 (2017). 28052137 PMC5241146
  4. [41]Szerwinski R and Güneysu T, in International Workshop on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems (Springer, 2008), pp.* 79– 99.
  5. [42]Glaser J, Nguyen TD, Anderson JA, Lui P, Spiga F, Millan JA, Morse DC, and Glotzer SC, Computer Physics Communications 192, 97 (2015).
  6. [43]Salomon-Ferrer R, Götz AW, Poole D, Le Grand S, and Walker RC, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 9, 3878 (2013). 26592383
  7. [44]Abraham MJ, Murtola T, Schulz R, Páll S, Smith JC, Hess B, and Lindahl E, SoftwareX 1, 19 (2015).
  8. [51]Nicholls A and Honig B, Journal of Computational Chemistry 12, 435 (1991). 11913378
  9. [52]Rochia W, Sridharan S, Nicholls A, Alexov E, Chiabrera A, and Honig B, Journal of Computational Chemistry 23, 128 (2002). 11913378
  10. [55]Hart PE, Nilsson NJ, and Raphael B, IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics 4, 100 (1968).
  11. [56]Xu J and Berger B, Journal of the ACM 53, 533 (2006).
  12. [58]Ikura T, Urakubo Y, and Ito N, Chemical Physics 307, 111 (2004).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hallen, M. A., Martin, J. W., Ojewole, A., Jou, J. D., Lowegard, A. U., Frenkel, M. S., Gainza, P., Nisonoff, H. M., Mukund, A., Wang, S., Holt, G. T., Zhou, D., Dowd, E., & Donald, B. R.
Affiliations
  • Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Department of Computer Science Duke University Durham North Carolina, 27708
Corresponding author
Donald, Bruce R.
Venue
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-14
Volume
39
Issue
30
Pages
2494-2507
ISSN
  • 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-987X
OpenAlex
W2951122824
Cited by
72
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Computational Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 GM‐118543, R01 GM‐78031)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
Pandion haliaetus, protein design, protein redesign, open source software, Python interface, GPU acceleration, conformational entropy, protein-protein binding, mutation effect prediction, design algorithm
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review