Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4,790

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Determining atom‐centered monopoles from molecular electrostatic potentials. The need for high sampling density in formamide conformational analysis

Breneman, Curt M., Wiberg, Kenneth B.·1990·Journal of Computational Chemistry

Abstract

An improved method for computing potential‐derived charges is described which is based upon the CHELP program available from QCPE.1 This approach (CHELPG) is shown to be considerably less dependent upon molecular orientation than the original CHELP program. In the second part of this work, the CHELPG point selection algorithm was used to analyze the changes in the potential‐derived charges in formamide during rotation about the CN bond. In order to achieve a level of rotational invariance less than 10% of the magnitude of the electronic effects studied, an equally‐spaced array of points 0.3 Å apart was required. Points found to be greater than 2.8 Å from any nucleus were eliminated, along with all points contained within the defined VDW distances from each of the atoms. The results are compared to those obtained by using CHELP. Even when large numbers of points (ca. 3000) were sampled using the CHELP selection routine, the results did not indicate a satisfactory level of rotatational invariance. On the basis of these results, the original CHELP program was found to be inadequate for analyzing internal rotations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcc.540110311

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 4,790

Metadata

Authors
Breneman, C. M., & Wiberg, K. B.
Venue
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-04
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
361-373
ISSN
  • 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-987X
OpenAlex
W2151334055
Cited by
4,790
References
0
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determining atom‐centered monopoles from molecular electrostatic potentials. The need for high sampling density in formamide conformational analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.540110311
The paper
Breneman, C. M., & Wiberg, K. B. (1990). Determining atom‐centered monopoles from molecular electrostatic potentials. The need for high sampling density in formamide conformational analysis. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540110311

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.