The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantum mechanical computations on very large molecular systems: The local self‐consistent field method
Abstract
Quantum chemical computations on a subset of a large molecule can be performed, at the neglect of diatomic differential overlap (NDDO) level, without further approximation provided that the atomic orbitals of the frontier atoms are replaced by parametrized orthogonal hybrid orbitals. The electrostatic interaction with the rest of the molecule, treated classically by the usual molecular mechanical approximations, is included into the self‐consistent field (SCF) equations. The first and second derivatives of energy are obtained analytically, allowing the search for energy minima and transition states as well as the resolution of Newton equations in molecular dynamics simulations. The local self‐consistent field (LSCF) method based on these approximations is tested by studying the intramolecular proton transfer in a Gly‐Arg‐Glu‐Gly model tetrapeptide, which reveals an excellent agreement between a computation performed on the whole molecule and the results obtained by the present method, especially if the quantum subsystem includes the side chains and the peptidic unit in between. The merits of the LSCF method are examplified by a study of proton transfer in the Asp 69—Arg 71 salt bridge in dihydrofolate reductase. Simulations of large systems, involving local changes of electronic structure, are therefore possible at a good degree of approximation by introducing a quantum chemical part in molecular dynamics studies. This methodology is expected to be very useful for reactivity studies in biomolecules or at the surface of covalent solids. © 1994 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
Case, D. A., Cheatham, T. E., Darden, T., Gohlke, H., Luo, R., Merz, K. M., Onufriev, A., Simmerling, C., Wang, B., & Woods, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20290 · Cited by 9,535
P450 Enzymes: Their Structure, Reactivity, and Selectivity—Modeled by QM/MM Calculations
Shaik, S., Cohen, S., Wang, Y., Chen, H., Kumar, D., & Thiel, W. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900121s · Cited by 1,083
Q UANTUM M ECHANICAL M ETHODS FOR E NZYME K INETICS
Gao, J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2002) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.53.091301.150114 · Cited by 733
Friesner, R. A., & Guallar, V. (2005) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.55.091602.094410 · Cited by 522
Computer Simulations of Enzyme Catalysis: Methods, Progress, and Insights
Warshel, A. (2003) · Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.141807 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Théry, V., Rinaldi, D., Rivail, J., Maigret, B., & Ferenczy, G. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Chemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 269-282
- ISSN
- 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-987X
- OpenAlex
- W2073719937
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum mechanical computations on very large molecular systems: The local self‐consistent field method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.540150303
- The paper
- Théry, V., Rinaldi, D., Rivail, J., Maigret, B., & Ferenczy, G. G. (1994). Quantum mechanical computations on very large molecular systems: The local self‐consistent field method. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540150303
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.