Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,055

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The double cubic lattice method: Efficient approaches to numerical integration of surface area and volume and to dot surface contouring of molecular assemblies

Eisenhaber, Frank, Lijnzaad, Philip, Argos, Patrick, Sander, Chris, Scharf, Michael·1995·Journal of Computational Chemistry

Abstract

The double cubic lattice method (DCLM) is an accurate and rapid approach for computing numerically molecular surface areas (such as the solvent accessible or van der Waals surface) and the volume and compactness of molecular assemblies and for generating dot surfaces. The algorithm has no special memory requirements and can be easily implemented. The computation speed is extremely high, making interactive calculation of surfaces, volumes, and dot surfaces for systems of 1000 and more atoms possible on single‐processor workstations. The algorithm can be easily parallelized. The DCLM is an algorithmic variant of the approach proposed by Shrake and Rupley (J. Mol. Biol., 79, 351–371, 1973). However, the application of two cubic lattices—one for grouping neighboring atomic centers and the other for grouping neighboring surface dots of an atom—results in a drastic reduction of central processing unit (CPU) time consumption by avoiding redundant distance checks. This is most noticeable for compact conformations. For instance, the calculation of the solvent accessible surface area of the crystal conformation of bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (entry 4PTI of the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank, 362‐point sphere for all 454 nonhydrogen atoms) takes less than 1 second (on a single R3000 processor of an SGI 4D/480, about 5 MFLOP). The DCLM does not depend on the spherical point distribution applied. The quality of unit sphere tesselations is discussed. We propose new ways of subdivision based on the icosahedron and dodecahedron, which achieve constantly low ratios of longest to shortest arcs over the whole frequency range. The DCLM is the method of choice, especially for large molecular complexes and high point densities. Its speed has been compared to the fastest techniques known to the authors, and it was found to be superior, especially when also taking into account the small memory requirement and the flexibility of the algorithm. The program text may be obtained on request. © 1995 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcc.540160303

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,055

Metadata

Authors
Eisenhaber, F., Lijnzaad, P., Argos, P., Sander, C., & Scharf, M.
Venue
Journal of Computational Chemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
273-284
ISSN
  • 0192-8651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-987X
OpenAlex
W2065232574
Cited by
1,055
References
1
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The double cubic lattice method: Efficient approaches to numerical integration of surface area and volume and to dot surface contouring of molecular assemblies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcc.540160303
The paper
Eisenhaber, F., Lijnzaad, P., Argos, P., Sander, C., & Scharf, M. (1995). The double cubic lattice method: Efficient approaches to numerical integration of surface area and volume and to dot surface contouring of molecular assemblies. Journal of Computational Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540160303

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.