Therapeutic factors in treating anxiety disorders
Open accessAbstract
This article is a condensation of several chapters from Principles of Therapeutic Change That Work edited by L.G. Castonguay and L.E. Beutler. The authors present the work of M.G. Newman, W.B. Stiles, A. Janeck, and S.R. Woody (2006), who outline an integrative model for effective psychotherapy of anxiety disorders. The authors also summarize, review, and extend several chapters on the current knowledge about therapeutic technique factors (S.R. Woody & T.H. Ollendick, 2006), participant factors (M.G. Newman, P. Crits-Christoph, M.B. Connelly Gibbons, & T.M. Erickson, 2006), and relationship factors (W.B. Stiles & B.E. Wolfe, 2006), which are related to anxiety disorder treatment outcome. The authors then place these factors and their practice implications within a common framework. Their integration is based on (a) the concept of appropriate responsiveness, and (b) a distinction between actions and achievements.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both reviews point to a paucity of research on client characteristics as predictors of treatment outcome.
“While these reviews draw consistent conclusions regarding the importance of client characteristics in predicting treatment outcome, both also point to the fact that there is a paucity of research on such factors.”
From Which client characteristics contribute to good and poor cognitive-behavioural treatment outcome for social anxiety disorder? A survey of clinicians (2012) · cites this paper as Newman et al., 2006
The opinion that intellect/reasoning ability contributes to good CBT outcome is at odds with the very few empirical studies which have examined intelligence in general and found that it is not a predictor of CBT outcome for those with anxiety disorders.
“This opinion is at odds with the very few empirical studies which have examined intelligence in general and found that it is not a predictor of CBT outcome for those with anxiety disorders (see Newman, et al., 2006 for a review).”
From Which client characteristics contribute to good and poor cognitive-behavioural treatment outcome for social anxiety disorder? A survey of clinicians (2012) · cites this paper as Newman, et al., 2006
Cites
Cloitre, M., Koenen, K. C., Cohen, L. R., & Han, H. (2002) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.70.5.1067 · Cited by 1,097 · see citing works
Cognitive processes in anxiety
Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983) · Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0146-6402(83)90015-2 · Cited by 738 · see citing works
Are emotions frightening? An extension of the fear of fear construct
Williams, K. E., Chambless, D. L., & Ahrens, A. (1997) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00098-8 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguity: A text comprehension study.
MacLeod, C., & Cohen, I. L. (1993) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.102.2.238 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Williams, K. E., & Chambless, D. L. (1990) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(05)80192-3 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Relationship of client participation to psychotherapy
Nelson, R. A., & Borkovec, T. D. (1989) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0005-7916(89)90048-7 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Haug, T., Nordgreen, T., Öst, L.-G., Tangen, T., Kvale, G., Hovland, O. J., Heiervang, E. R., & Havik, O. E. (2016) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2015.12.004 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Frei, J., & Peters, L. (2012) · Behaviour Change · doi:10.1017/bec.2012.22 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Newman, M. G., & Stiles, W. B.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Miami University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Newman, Michelle G.
- ORCID
- Stiles, William B.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-03-14
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 649-659
- ISSN
- 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4679
- OpenAlex
- W2023563223
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- anxiety disorders, psychotherapy outcome, therapeutic factors, therapeutic relationship
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapeutic Processes, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
