Cultural adaptations and therapist multicultural competence: Two meta‐analytic reviews
Abstract
Mental health treatments can be more effective when they align with the culture of the client and when therapists demonstrate multicultural competence. We summarize relevant research findings in two meta‐analyses. In the meta‐analysis examining culturally adapted interventions, the average effect size across 99 studies was d = 0.50 (0.35 after accounting for publication bias). In the second meta‐analysis on 15 studies of therapist cultural competence, the results differed by rating source: Client‐rated measures of therapist cultural competence correlated strongly ( r = 0.38) with treatment outcomes but therapists’ self‐rated competency did not ( r = 0.06). We describe patient considerations and research limitations. We conclude with research supported therapeutic practices that help clients benefit from modifications to treatment related to culture.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Culturally adapted treatments are more effective, acceptable, and satisfying for patients.
“Research consistently shows that culturally adapted treatments are more effective, acceptable, and satisfying for patients [58-60].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 289
- Authors
- Soto, A., Smith, T. B., Griner, D., Domenech Rodríguez, M., & Bernal, G.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- Department of Counseling and Psychological Services, Brown University Providence Rhode Island
- Corresponding author
- Soto, Alberto
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-08-08
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1907-1923
- ISSN
- 0021-9762 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-4679
- OpenAlex
- W2885196820
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
- ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Keywords
- culturally tailored interventions, culturally adapted psychotherapy, treatment outcomes, self-rated competence, publication bias, therapeutic practice
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy, Research, Treatment Outcome, Cultural Diversity, Cultural Competency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review