The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sense of Community Index and development of a Brief SCI
Abstract
The Sense of Community Index (SCI) is the most widely used measure of the construct, despite the lack of confirmation of its intended dimensions or subscales. Yet psychometric appraisals of the SCI have never used the proper tool for evaluating an established dimensional construct: confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The Block Booster Project data set (of residents of 47 street blocks in Brooklyn and Queens, New York) used in developing the original SCI in 1985 was used here in its reassessment, along with a 1‐year follow‐up survey expanded to 61 blocks. The Sense of Community Index reanalysis using CFA yielded poor model fit for McMillan and Chavis' (1986) original theoretical formulation as well as for a single‐factor index, prompting development of a Brief SCI. The eight‐item, three‐factor BSCI showed good model fit with CFA, reliable construct validity in multilevel correlational analyses, and it differentiated street block neighborhoods reliably based on intragroup agreement, while retaining the profile of a cognitive‐perceptual construct, which does not crossover with other popular community psychology constructs such as place attachment and community satisfaction. The authors, however, recommend future uses of the BSCI employ a 5‐point Likert‐type response format to increase the measure's variability, sensitivity, and internal reliability. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comm Psychol 31: 279–296, 2003.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Cited by
Sense of community, civic engagement and social well‐being in Italian adolescents
Albanesi, C., Cicognani, E., & Zani, B. (2007) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.903 · Cited by 313
Stewart, K., & Townley, G. (2020) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/ajcp.12456 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, D. A., & Perkins, D. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Community Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-04-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-296
- ISSN
- 0090-4392 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-6629
- OpenAlex
- W2098201357
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sense of Community Index and development of a Brief SCI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/jcop.10046
- The paper
- Long, D. A., & Perkins, D. D. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sense of Community Index and development of a Brief SCI. Journal of Community Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.10046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.