Cited by 75Community Health and DevelopmentPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionHealth, psychology, and well-being

How far have we come? An integrative review of the current literature on sense of community and well-being

Stewart, Katricia, Townley, Greg·2020·American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

Sense of community and well‐being are considered core tenets in the field of community psychology, acting as focal points for theory, research, and action. This integrative review synthesizes the empirical literature on sense of community and well‐being with respect to four research questions focused on the relationships between these variables, the methodologies used to study those relationships, and how future research might expand upon the current literature. A search of the available literature produced 30 articles that met the search criteria, based primarily on conceptualizations and measurement of both sense of community and hedonic and eudaimonic well‐being. This review suggests a general consensus across the literature of a positive relationship between sense of community and well‐being among both youth and adults in a variety of settings, and discusses the strengths and limitations of this area of research, pointing to the need for more nuanced, ecologically valid research that incorporates more qualitative and critical methodologies. We hope that this review can promote a more thorough understanding of how sense of community and individual well‐being relate to each other, and that ongoing research in this area can be a catalyst for action research and interventions that are applied to pressing contemporary issues as well as strengths‐based approaches focused on how to foster and support the well‐being of individuals within their community contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ajcp.12456

Cites

164 of 164 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

17 of the 181 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stewart, K., & Townley, G.
Affiliations
Portland State University (US)
Corresponding author
Stewart, Katricia
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-18
Volume
66
Issue
1-2
Pages
166-189
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
OpenAlex
W3081116729
Cited by
75
References
181
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
sense of community, well-being, hedonic well-being, eudaimonic well-being, community psychology, youth, adults, strengths-based approach, community-based intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Community Participation, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Social Support, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review