Cited by 42Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportEarly Childhood Education and Development

Randomized evaluation of a single semester transitional mentoring program for first year middle school students: a cautionary result for brief, school-based mentoring programs

McQuillin, Samuel, Smith, Bradley, Strait, Gerald·2011·Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

School-based youth mentoring is popular in the United States. There are reasons to believe that school-based mentoring might be beneficial, but research has found primarily small effects and some negative effects. This study describes a formal evaluation of a single semester mentoring program that was implemented within the context of a school-university-community partnership. Middle school students were randomly assigned to a school-based mentoring program (n=60) or a control group (n=60) during the first semester of middle school. Results suggest that random assignment to the mentoring program designed to ease the transition to middle school was associated with statistically significant decreases in reading grades and null effects on other measures, including school and teacher connectedness. These results reinforce the need to evaluate mentoring programs on a case-by-case basis and continue to innovate in the area of school-based mentoring until robust, replicable evidence-based procedures are identified. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jcop.20475

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite positive effects, the SBM program was not entirely successful in several studies.

    “Despite the positive effects of SBM, the program was not entirely successful in several studies (e.g., Bodin and Leifman, 2011; McQuillin et al., 2011; Herrera et al., 2011; Schwartz et al., 2012; Bayer et al., 2015; Heppen et al. (2018); Alwani et al., 2023; Butler et al., 2024).”
  • Two studies found that a short-term SBM program (lasting less than six months) did not offer substantial advantages to participants.

    “Two studies found that a short-term SBM program (lasting less than six months) did not offer substantial advantages to participants (e.g., McQuillin et al., 2011; Schwartz et al., 2012).”
  • These findings are consistent with previous research and reviews demonstrating positive impact of SBM programs on academic, social, and behavioral outcomes.

    “These findings are consistent with previous research and reviews (e.g., McQuillin et al., 2011; McArthur et al., 2017; McCoy, 2017; Karaferye, 2018; Grey, 2019; May et al., 2021; Jefferson, 2022; Fehérvári and Varga, 2023; Richardson, 2024; Turgut and Tasçi, 2024), which demonstrate the positive impact of SBM programs on academic, social, and behavioral outcomes.”
  • This aligns with earlier reviews suggesting that the impacts of mentoring are significant but not large.

    “This aligns with earlier reviews suggesting that the impacts of mentoring are significant but not large (Hall, 2003; McQuillin et al., 2011; T olan et al., 2014; Raposa et al., 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McQuillin, S., Smith, B., & Strait, G.
Affiliations
University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
McQuillin, Samuel
Venue
Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-11
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
844-859
ISSN
0090-4392 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150834573
Cited by
42
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Community Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
school-based mentoring, youth mentoring programs, junior high school students, middle school transition, school connectedness, university-school-community partnership, program evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review